"There is only one RICKY HATTON!!!!!!!!!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by unitas, Dec 19, 2007.


  1. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,351
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Saying is record is fabricated and having cheap digs at him either proves he has not got a life or a ****. I would love him to get in the ring with these fighters hatton as beat and see how long he could last with them.
     
  2. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    i too think the record is blown out of proportion. tszyu and castillo were badly faded or shot.

    he lost to collazo imo.

    even tackie (who was not special to begin with) was pretty much shot.

    juan urango was a paper champ who had gotten a gift decision over that tunisian guy living in australia.

    and if you look over his record there are too many bums he faced when he was defending that bull**** wbu belt.

    so there can be no doubt that record was inflated.
     
  3. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    No more than any other fighter. All fighters fight their share of tomato cans.
     
  4. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    that is a lie. i didnt see mayweather needing 35 fights before fighting a world level operator.

    nor did luis collazo.

    nor did margarito.

    nor did.......the list is endless.
     
  5. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,351
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Collazo yes that one was close but hatton beat him fair and sqaure. He had no favors from the ref or the judges becasue they were american.
     
  6. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    no i disagree. collazo won fair and square.

    and he did get help from the judges. the fight was with hbo........and hatton was the star. he was the house fighter.

    and he got help from the ref who called the bogus knockdown.
     
  7. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,351
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Right bogus knockdown yes it him on the chin he went down, fair do's it was a flash knockdown but it still was a knockdown. That shite about HBO is bollocks because if that were true wouldn't Oscar and Marco had won their respective bouts against PBf and JMM. Your Just an hater admit even if he beats witter and mallinaggi u will probabaly say oh witter was never that good and mallinaggi was featherfisted.
     
  8. rr94

    rr94 Belt Holder Full Member

    1,738
    0
    May 25, 2007
    whats your scorecard buddy? round for round.

    I was ringside, and we weren't booing because we didn't like Hatton. In fact, we were all excited to see him. It was a screwjob.
     
  9. FRKO

    FRKO "A MAN" Full Member

    3,083
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    Someone ban this clown. Please.
     
  10. rr94

    rr94 Belt Holder Full Member

    1,738
    0
    May 25, 2007
    It was a knockdown, but Hatton didn't win that fight. You're in denial.
     
  11. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,351
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    I am not in denial I was there fair enough I was three sheets to the wind at the end but at the beginning of the fight hatton won the first 6 rounds that I am pretty sure of because I was sober then. Yes hatton had is sticky patch but all the fighters do. I think the eleventh round won it for hatton because collazo was on the retreat.
     
  12. bumdujour

    bumdujour Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    18
    Jul 29, 2007
    see, this is why you brits get so much heat and are not taken seriously.

    everything is wrong unless hatton is the winner.

    collazo won a close but clear decision. after all he was the defending champ!!! the knockdown was a push.
    hatton was the hbo cash cow........collazo just an unkown alphabet champ who came out of nowhere at the time. that is why hatton won.
    it was a financial decision.

    and everyone who says anything critical about a british fighter is just being called a hater. its getting kind of obvious. even if the other side makes valid points.

    keep that up and nobody will take you or your boxers seriously.
     
  13. Drexl

    Drexl Your Hero Full Member

    4,427
    1
    Jan 24, 2005
    So they didn't fight as often. The list is also endless of fighters that DID take over 30 fights before stepping up to World Class opponents.

    All I said was that every fighter has nobodies on their record. That is not a lie. Get a grip.
     
  14. pijo

    pijo Feed the Pope Full Member

    3,635
    1
    Jul 28, 2007
    Well what does that say about Mayweather?
     
  15. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,351
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Yes he was but people calling him a fraud his a bit too much. I mean have a seen a few fights were the brits have been battered Naz V barerra was my first fight in vegas 16 years old I was. Did not go to the floyd fight as i did not have the cash but I went to the urango and castillo fight.