There was a time when fighters had to pass a test first before they become contenders

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FAT_TONEY, Jul 12, 2011.


  1. FAT_TONEY

    FAT_TONEY Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    12
    Feb 28, 2011
    Looking at Vitalis last bunch of defenses - Chris Arreola, Kevin Johnson, Sosnowski and Solis.. It struck me that all of them didn't pass a real test before they got thrown in against Vitali. They were all hypejobs, some of them undefeated, yeah, but against what opposition? No wonder Vitali just trashed them. They weren't ready and got embarrassed. I know Vitali is good, but those guys weren't even competitive.

    Back in the day, fighters had to pass a test - they had to deserve their title-shot first. Like beating an ex-champ.

    Helenius is on the right path I feel. He already beat 2 ex-'champs' in Brewster and Sam Peter. I know Brewster was quite shot, but Peter was still dangerous, and he stopped them. Now he's getting put in the ring against another ex-'champ' in Lyakhovich - he's not taking the easy road. I mean he could also fight someone like Travis Walker. If Helenius continues like that and keeps winning, he'll be a true contender in about a years time.

    Your thoughts?
     
  2. outslugger

    outslugger The Relentless Stalker Full Member

    1,068
    0
    Apr 27, 2011
    Right now there's no gatekeepers in the HW division, raw prospects become contenders really fast and get destroyed by the K-Bros, I think Povetkin is doing a good job by ducking the Klits until he is ready
     
  3. Masamune

    Masamune Active Member Full Member

    1,042
    3
    Nov 13, 2010
    Its endemic of all boxing right now ,

    No fighter is developed anymore like they used to be - meeting progressively tougher opponents , maybe dropping a points loss or two once they started to meet guys in the top ten but using that experience as a learning curve .

    These days as soon as a prospect suffers a defeat we right him off as a hype job or a bum - two losses and his career is all but over , fighters dont have that 'seasoning' anymore that comes with the experience of mixing it at the top level with different styles of fighting .

    Now its 20 fights against weak opposition to build an impressive KO percentage then in for a title shot - where are the gate keepers ? The proffessional journeymen who could give a top prospect 10 rounds of hell - they may risk losing thier 0 on thier record but such a fight is a like a Phd in the development of a fighter .

    Look at Jermaine Taylor - in relative terms he was still only a prospect when he was put in with a master craftsman like B Hop in only his 24th fight
    Yes , he got the decision twice but now at 33 when he should be just coming off his peak but still very much at the top of his game, instead he
    his shot to bits and going nowhere .


    just mt 2 cents and I dont know jack **** really !
     
  4. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    youre right....
    look at shannon briggs resume...and this isnt sarcasm...the guy doesnt hold 1 win his entire career over a top 10 guy except a 48 year old foreman who he ran from all night...and the white wolf who behind on all cards knocked him out with seconds left in the fight


    june 2007 lost to Ibragimov
    2008 inactive
    dec 2009 Marcus Mgee 22 wins 17 losses
    april 2010 rafael pedro 20 wins 8 defeats
    may 2010 dominc alexander 19 wins 8 defeats
    rob calloway 70 wins 11 defeats (1 win last 5 fights)


    that impressive resume of 5 fights in 4 years against guys that werent even top 100 ranked earned him the beating of his life vs vitali ....
    lots of things have changed over they years....its pretty bad
     
  5. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008

    that actually is pretty dead on :good
     
  6. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    There seems to be a lack of gatekeepers in boxing in general and specifically in the HW division.

    I miss those fights that told us whether the young guy was for real or not. It depended on whether he could get through an established veteran who was trying to hang onto his career. Great drama and truly hard fought fights.
     
  7. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    I think a big problem is fans like the ones on this board that are constantly starting "hypejob" threads about any prospect that loses a fight. Promoters take their cues from talk like this and won't put their young fighters in with anyone decent.
    People don't seem to want good competition anymore as much as they want celebrities and hero-worship.
    Take a guy like Lucian Bute. The guy is damn good, but he's got two things working in opposite directions, for and against him.
    On one hand, he's being lauded as the greatest ever by his french-canadian worshipers. He hasn't really earned that yet.
    On the other hand, the guys he's been beating lately aren't total stiffs. He's fighting the "just under the top echelon" level guys, and blowing them out.
    True, we don't know yet if he belongs with the elite, but let's not call the guys he's beating bums. They've won a lot of boxing matches themselves. People think they're commenting on Bute alone, but their really giving a backhanded slight to the journeyman fighters that this sport so desperately needs in order to develop those guys.
    I could go on and on, but I'll stop here for now. My basic point is, fans have to take part of the blame for the state of the boxing scene.
     
  8. FAT_TONEY

    FAT_TONEY Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    12
    Feb 28, 2011
    quality post
     
  9. FAT_TONEY

    FAT_TONEY Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    12
    Feb 28, 2011
    I think there are still gatekeepers around, even in teh HW division. What about Oli McCall? 10 hard rounds, this guy won't be put away easily.
    Same with James Toney. Hasim Rahman is still there. Some young lion send these guys into retirement (if they can).
     
  10. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    76
    May 3, 2006
    Boxing fans have to take their part of the blame for creating 'hypejobs'. But it's the promoters who are responsible in my eyes.

    You have a promising young fighter, maybe even an olympic medalist, who at best is also popular with some part of the public and has an exciting, fan-friendly style. This is any promoters dream, they sign him and put some cash in that fighter. Not because they want to build up the GOAT, but because they see a lot of $ - and that is perfectably understandable, because they're businessmen. They want to have a new star, and a star better have an unbeaten record and at least 1 belt so he can call himself 'the champ'. The sooner the better. There you go, he's getting set against 15-20 journeymen, none of them too hard, no risky fights, and these days that's enough to create a buzz and have him ranked very high with at least one of the corrupt boxing associations. If things go well there's at least an eliminator to be fought, but most of the time the new star gets his title-shot at the big stage, ready or not, and the promoter can finally cash in. If he wins, everything is fine, but if he loses he'll be a total failure doomed to lurk on the undercard of the next young star his promoter then chooses to build up.