There was never a juiced Canelo

You have zero credibility. Your own GGGoon buddy even said you are unreasonable when it comes to certain fighters.

The fact that you proclaim Margarito is 100% innocent but you won't give Canelo the benefit of the doubt destroys any credibility you may of had.

 

Ive known Tony since 1999 I have absolutely no wish to ever know a cheat like clenelo

 

He clearly tested dirty. That doesn't by any means translates into foul play.

 

Margarito used illegal pads that is a fact.
Canelo's urine test came back positive, that is a fact.

You have zero credibility, that is a fact.

 

Some fighters are friends some I follow BUT when it comes to cheating they are all the same.. If anyone could show me one iota of proof Tony ever cheated I's be on his case immediately but no one have been able to do it

 

ROFLMAO Then pray tell me what it does translate to Dumbo

 

Your trolling is getting old and repetitive. We're talking about trace amounts of clenbuterol for goodness sake. You're acting like Canelo is Jose Canseco or something. The whole "not once but twice" argument is a fallacy. Both tests were administered within a 3 day time period. The 2nd test was extremely low, barely even registered, as would be expected for someone than accidentally consumed meat days earlier.

It's obvious to anyone who isn't over the top invested in a pro-GGG approach that Canelo went to a restaurant, ate some meat, got tested the next day, then again 3 days later and both tests show the trace naturally leaving his system.

You're so desperate to use big bad words like "dirty / cheat / dirt bag / etc" to describe Canelo so desperate to cling to this idea that he was cheating. CJ, you've made your view clear to the forum, we know how much you hate Canelo and want to make him look bad. But you're starting to sound like a broken record, and it's not looking too good for you with the rematch approaching.

The fact is Canelo has been randomly tested to a far greater extent than pretty much anybody currently in the sport. Legends from past decades did not voluntarily submit themselves to random drug testing like Canelo has. Therefore Canelo is confirmed cleaner than 99.9% of boxers who have ever stepped into the ring throughout the history of the sport. My advice to you is give it a rest, and start getting excited about the rematch. The clenbuterol situation is in the past. Nothing serious happened, he ate some meat, big whoop. Get over it, and lets look forward to the rematch.

 

Lol you’re onto it,so funny when you read these posts like they can kid a kidder.
Even those of us with hardly any knowledge can read comments on YouTube from body builder types ect who all say that Clen is just one part of a whole host of cocktails that really do bloody work.
Even assuming Clenbuterol was used on its own,apparently it’s a very effective drug in its own right and would f*** you right up if one was take a good amount of it off the bat as it were.

 

To have got the level of Clenbuterol in his system he;d have had to eat the whole cow ROFLMAO. Also Mr Einstein did you realize clenbuterol
is a masking agent too?? Wonder what mixture of goodies he was on ???

 

Yes even I don’t get the tested twice thing as it goes without saying that if you test once for it then it’s still gonna be there in a day or two,in effect he tested once for it as you can’t be done twice for something you’ve already admitted to right?

 

Tainted meat.

Margarito has elements of Plaster in his pads. What does that translate too?

 

OK Mr. Drug testing expert, are you aware that the first test was well within what WADA considers trace amounts consistent with meat contamination and was a much lower amount than Vargas or Nery tested positive for?

This might be some sort of comedy routine to you, but if you're actually being serious with that comment, you're flat out wrong.

It's a masking agent is it, ohh scary . . . it's also a substance that is known to be in meat in Mexico.

 

It's just crazy talk to bring up the "he tested positive twice" argument as if that means something. And frankly if you're using that argument to try to make Canelo look bad, it's obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about in real terms.

 

That’s a whole can of worms in itself and it’s why I believe the meat excuse is a psy op and I’ll explain why as surely any farmer worth his salt isn’t gonna dope his cow up to the eyeballs and slaughter it the next day as that just defeats the object of giving PEDs right?
Course Reynoso knows all this and let’s just say that levels wise it was way more than that cyclist got banned for whilst blaming the meat and other examples which is why I think the whole thing was literally cooked up to make it fit the narrative.
Can we say that if Golovkin tested the same amount and claimed it was the meat,would he of been given the same treatment?actually that’s a bad example as he’s involved in the same big money fight so he may of gotten same but you get my point.

 

No he had the ingredients of HUMAN SWEAT actually