There's really not much difference between Deontay Wilder and Gennady Golovkin.

Well done, you got me to post on this ridiculous thread :good

If you had any, and I mean any credibility left then you just lost it with that sentence.

You obviously do this for the site to get it moving because nobody, not even a new comer to the sport would make such a stupid statement.

I will not be commenting or even looking at any more of your relentless threads, this was the straw that broke the camels back..... Yes I'm a f***ing camel, I've got the hump.

 

At least Wilder has Stiverne on his resume. Golovkin's biggest win remains to be Rubio, or if you're shameless enough like every single mentally disabled GGG fan, then you can safely bring up Ouma.

 

That was the only top 10 opponent Wilder has faced Golovkin has decapitated the entire top ten of the (160) division, besides the other three (title holders) that are too afraid to fight him. Geale was a unified champion, Stiverne only had one belt. Murray was robbed against Martinez, Murray would have been the (160) pound champion. If only Cotto had picked GGG as an opponent, than we would have GGG with two belts :yep Skill wise Golovkin is leaps and bounds ahead of Wilder.

 

Golovkin is taller, blacker, slicker, and has the longer reach. It's no contest.

 

Wilders career is embarrassing lol

 

You are a jester,arent you! Wilder has fought a couple of no-hopers and totally shot vets.Molina and Stivern are his only decent skalps.
GGG stopped Khomitsky in his 8th pro fight.Khomitsky is more or less Molina's counterpart at middle weight.
Pah! It is just ridiculous this thread! It isnt even worth to discuss:-(

 

Boxing ability is quite similar? Are you high?

Wilder shows very little technical ability.

The only, and I mean only thing you can say that they have in common is they are both considered power punchers... That's it MVC

 

GGG ko 3