These Are The 5 Most Disgraceful Boxers Currently in the Fight Game...

Plenty to take issue with there. I'll leave it to someone else, however, as I haven't the time or the commitment. Though I wouldn't exactly call Golovkin's resume weak, his record does lack the name of an elite fighter. But we all know that's little to no fault of his own, and any reasonable person would willingly admit it.

 

Yes it is he ducked ward stays in a weak division brings up a ww to fight at the full mw limit and is pricing himself out against the cash cow in canelo and Martin Murray is the best fighter he's faced a guy who never won a title. All of those guys I mentioned have fought better comp than ggg has and I'm sure I've left out others from hw to ww to.

 

OK, mate. That's patently false, but somehow I don't think truth is your forte. Anyway, I'm away off to cheer on Ricky Burns. How does his resume compare to Golovkin's?

 

Stick around. You'll see that most things Pimp C posts are terribly biased and opinion filled. Or outright false.

 

- Ward would've agreed to fight Floyd at 160lbs. Ward rejected the 164lb catchweight with Golovkin even though that's the most fair solution for both of them.

- Golovkin would've agreed to fight Froch or Chavez Jr at 168lbs. Golovkin wasn't willing to fight Andre Ward at 168lbs.

Either way, money talks. The problem is when you're a Mayweather and money talks to the extent that you'd wait until a fighter is semi-shot and a welterweight version of himself.

 

Everyone sees him for what he truly is, a light skinned black supremacist who doesn't care for truth.
He has high functioning autism btw.

 

Your logic makes no sense. Just because Canelo won the 'championship' at 155 doesn't mean he had defend it at that weight which he also disgracefully did. Nothing was stopping him from fighting at 160 but he was too scared to do such.

 

He says Porter, Anthony Dirrill, Quillin, Jacobs, Lee....ALL have better resumes than 3G. He just pulled names outta his stanky *ss.

 

Wrong. Khan was stopping him from fighting at 160. Khan stated emphatically that he wouldn't have fought Canelo at 160. From Khan's perspective, it was 155 or no fight.

 

LOL nobody said Canelo had to fight Khan. Canelo is a total fraud and the laughingstock of the sport right now. Not one thing you posted makes logical sense. It was all opinion and excuses.

 

GG should be number one on that list! Hasn't fought no big name or threat! And loves on picking smaller fighters than him...

 

team ggg said they are ducking Eubank? What mental deficiency do you have?

 

How pathetic, but expected.

 

Khan was a bigger name than anyone at 160 not named Golovkin. (lets be real, Khan has a better resume than Golovkin in terms of who he beat / fought) Who could Canelo have fought at 160 that would have been a bigger fight than Khan?

You got to remember, that Khan was the guy that practically everyone wanted to see fight Mayweather in 2015. When Khan offered to fight Canelo, Canelo jumped at the opportunity. You're criticizing Canelo for not challenging a seasoned Middleweight to fight at 160 when Canelo has never fought at 160 in his entire life. That or you're asking a WW or a LMW to fight Canelo at 160 just because he's holding a MW belt. Which is exactly what GG did with Brook and most people thought that was completely ridiculous, heck one of the GG's belts wasn't even on the line because the commision thought it was so ridiculous. All the while not a peep from you about how Cotto was draining MWs long before he ever fought Canelo at 155, draining Geale to 157, a guy that Golovkin already stopped, after demanding a 159 catchweight vs an injured Martinez.

My posts are very logical, you just hate it because it exposes your hypocrisy regarding Canelo and it destroys your ability to criticize him.

 

They do have better resumes they have all faced better fighters than what ggg has faced. Ggg resume is hot garbage his level of comp is a joke