But...but.... the title.... it said INDISPUTABLE. George the man said indisputable so I’m going to ask you to refrain from using logic or common sense.
I'm curious as to what criteria most use to make their lists. I get the impression # of divisions fought would be one most use. Maybe whether unification occurred. Doubtful title defenses in one division since 90% of the list makes seem to think one MUST move up in weight. Hmm...
It's the most important thing. Resume is nearly everything. Everybody looks like Tommy Hearns when they beat on tomato cans. See Keith Thurman.
He hasn't? Dude...i'm just curious to your criteria. Everyone seems to have different reasons for their P4P lists. So far all you have is: No HW's Beat a top guy in prime
So then what about Pac? He basically did what the smaller guys on the list did and then went and did everything the medium sized guys did. But it's all on one resume! This looks like more of an eye-test list which is fine but everyone has their own eye-test which will tell them something different.