Yeah, Crawford can fight inside, counterpunch, come foward, and fight on and off the ropes. Yeah he can. If you've watched him...then you would know this. Broner isn't lazy, he just becomes too defensive in fights. Crawford stays in range and constantly throws punches.
Does Crawford get overly aggressive? Just thinking back to the Dulorme fight -- when Crawford had him against the ropes after the first knock down he was methodical with a capital "M" in his attack. Even after the second KD he didn't go nuts, just a careful body/head/head/body series of punches.
Broner can't properly integrate his offense and defense. When he's playing defense (aka trying to be like Floyd), his offense isn't as effective. And he's being offensive, he isn't that hard to hit. Crawford integrates both. He knows how to come forward, and move back effectively while making guys miss and still being in range and position to counter them. This is what that **** Melo is not seeing.
:good To me when Broner trades, he leaves himself open to be countered. When he's attacking he's a pretty good fighter.
Only... he's not. Crawford is better than Broner at EVERY FACET of boxing. Broner has not ONE edge. Not one.
Yeah, and Forrest owned every facet over Mayorga too. Boxing is filled with EVERY FACET fights and have been proven wrong over and over. Broner has a jab, and he has the power. This fight might come down to punch activity where Crawford is favored, but Crawfords fans would be on pins and needles all fight.