They planning to screw Usyk

I don´t agree with OP.
But I find it hilarious that the WBC is basically stating that judges are incompetent and we need a solution to that. But the solution they came up with is to have more judges

 

I don't think an essay on a conspiracy within a fight that has yet to even occur is warranted.

How does one pull so much detail out of their imagination?

 

I assume its both camps clashing in the background what referees should judge this fight and there is the idea of incresing the overall number so both camps can have "their" guys on the table .

 

AJ was heavier and longer too.

 

We're talking about millions and millions of dollars. Robbing Usyk will make everybody richer. Why share the profit with an Ukrainian who has no lobby and whose country is dependent on the West?

 

It's insane, a guy who loves Anthony Joshua and Eddie Hearn that much that hes starting 50 threads a year to try and provoke as much hate as possible on Tyson Fury

This guy is literally gonna be on suicide watch for a month after Fury dismantles Usyk

 

Yes bingo

 

With regards the first part of your statement, if that's true, then it's good the fight didn't happen a year ago or a few months ago when they wouldn't give the Ukrainian hero a loss, and this sentiment kinda invalidates the people crying about deck stacking in Fury's favour, if Usyk supporters wanted the fight to happen at a time when no judge would score against the Ukrainian hero. For the record ,I do think the fight should have happened a year ago, but by your own admission we're more likely to get fair scoring now so I'm not complaining

 

As I said I dont want any side being here favor. Now we can be little worried because fight Fury vs Joshua is probably biggest cash fight to make.
And for sure Fury in past show that he can win fight with fauls opponents without reffery protest. I want clear fight and clear decision but I would surspriced if it end without any controversy. Hope Im wrong.

 

I agree, it's the biggest cash fight to make, but with the Saudi events so far I'm pretty sure they're losing money, as the event itself isn't the end goal the way it is in the west, rather they're investing in building up Saudi as a sports and entertainment destination, so I think a controversial result in the biggest fight of the last 25 years (except maybe May-Pac) would be detrimental to what they're trying to achieve over there

 

Am I missing something? What does that Tweet have to do with Usyk?

 

This is true, but why not watch the fight first? Let's see how it plays out.

 

I think you have some valid points. Wouldn't be the first robbery in a Fury fight.

 

Lordlosh has always been mental.

 

True. AJ isn't as long or as skilled.