They're avoiding Hassan N’Dam N’Jikam

that's not how boxing works. so breidis prescott can beat Zab, Paulie and all those guys because he knocked Amir Khan out right?

 

well that's the only fight I've seen him in, so what else should I base it on? why are all these guys with 75 v cash coming at me for my predictions?! take notes instead.

 

It gives you a clue about N'dams punching power. I dont think he will be breaking down sanders late on at all. The way you beat opponents do matter of course, thats just one example. O'sullivan could barely land a punch on saunders.

 

You have to realize that you can't get everyone out of there. I never said N'dam would stop Saunders he'd just be too much. Also saying the way you beat opponents matter is also not true. Danny couldn't get an old Zab outta there, yet Khan did, are you saying that shows something about his power, and Khan has more power than him?

 

dannys power isnt much better than khans. Danny has a chin. khan does not, thats the difference. khan's speed was too much for zab, zab looked to have quit though. its easier to defend power than speed when your a past prime fighter.

Anyway so you think n'dam outworks sanders to a UD Then? :think

 

Why are so many people ridin this guy's ****???

The only guys worth watching at middleweight are GGG and Cotto, and to a lesser extent, Jacobs, Quillin, and Lee.

Who is N'Dam? And who gives a ****.

Get excited about a never was and never will be.

 

That's not my point, but here's another example, Matthyse could not stop Zab, are you questioning his power too? Khan's power is not even close to Danny's let alone Lucas. And yep, N'dam outworks Saunders to a clear Ud win.

 

Zab quit against khan for some unknown reason, bad example. danny's power is overated. i dont get your point, you all change course.

So thats all you needed to say. I dont think he can outbox sanders for the first half, he may eek out the decision in the second half.

 

He didn't quit, that body punch hurt him bad. It wasn't a "bad example".

 

The point you were trying to make was 'how you win, isnt important' and although N'dam couldnt knock out fitzgerald means nothing to how Sanders vs N'dam plays out. You then said n'dam wins a decision, so he doesnt knock sanders out. Right we get the point. brilliant moving on.

 

The point I was making is it's extremely dumb to compare someone Saunders beat that knocked someone N'dam won a decision against, and say Saunders has the advantage due to this. Boxing just doesn't work like that.

 

didn't read the thread but...

Sturm is a super middleweight. Saunders was already committed to fighting the winner of Lee-Quillin. Soliman has already stated he would take the fight but no word yet from Lemieux's camp.

 

No but i think it rules out a N'dam stoppage to be honest. Barring sanders does something silly. but brenny was talking about levels. when the levels arent too far apart actually. N'dam gets beaten by as many opponents as BJS does, he's just got more experience. And this fight will be a close one. Bjs nicks it. :hey

extremely dum

 

Well I clearly stated in many threads that I thought N'dam would win a wide UD, taking the cake the last half of the fight due to his volume. I don't see Saunders getting stopped either, I thought this was clear. The reason why he brought that up was clearly to say that Saunders has the advantage due to that, not to say that N'dam won't stop Saunders. BJS will get schooled, take my advice and don't bet your vcash on Saunders. It'll save you the trouble of building up again.

 

almost as dumb as misspelling professional like 50 times :rofl. just playing with you lepin, I know you're trying, that's all we can ask.