thinking about betting on maskaev +300

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lenin, Dec 11, 2007.


  1. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    right now its maskaev at +300 and Peter -450. i dont think the odds will get any better for Oleg than they are now. I got -200 odds on mayweather last weekend, put down $200 and made $100. any advice? thanks in advance
     
  2. Kostya Zoo

    Kostya Zoo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Feb 6, 2006
    I think it's a great bet. Maskaev has a great chance to beat the extremely overrated Peter.
     
  3. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    some of the other fights they have odds for:
    Alex Arthur -1500 Stephen Foster +700
    Marco Huck -275 Steve Cunningham +215
    Paul Malignaggi -450 Herman Ngoudjo +300
    Roy Jones Jr -325 Felix Trinidad +250
    Cory Spinks -450 Verno Phillips +300
    Mike Mollo -115 Andrew Golota -115
    Oleg Maskaev +300 Samuel Peter-450
    Kelly Pavlik-240 Jermain Taylor +190
    Wladimir Klitshko-600 Sultan Ibragimov +400
    Manny Pacquiao-140 Juan Manuel Marquez+110
     
  4. Kostya Zoo

    Kostya Zoo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Feb 6, 2006
    how much does that pay out if Maskaev wins?
     
  5. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    if I'd put down $100 i'd make $300 profit. very tempting
     
  6. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    It's actually not a bad bet to take. I wouldn't bet on Maskaev since I believe he will be KO'd early, but Peter showed his vulnerabilities against McCline. If he was in that kind of trouble with Maskaev, he would have been stopped.
     
  7. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Very foolish to bet on an old, no legs, glass jawed fighter who also would not be at any version of a 'stylistic advantage'.
     
  8. ravtrav

    ravtrav Active Member Full Member

    1,413
    0
    Jun 16, 2006
    I'd rather risk it on Tito +250
     
  9. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    I might just place $50 on each fight and see how it turns out
     
  10. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    From that list, Ngoudjo, Trinidad, Oleg and Taylor all see like pretty good bets to me (note that's different from "I think they're going to win"). Mollo/Golota is intersting - even bookies have no clue what to do with the Foul Pole.
     
  11. Nico

    Nico hi. Full Member

    950
    1
    Aug 17, 2005

    Putting money on either Tito or Maskaev would be a waste, in my opinion.
     
  12. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    in boxing anything can happen and if I win only 1 of those 2 i'll still make around $100 profit
     
  13. Hrak

    Hrak Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,673
    2
    Mar 15, 2006
    Look at the current moment its a safer bet then it was before the Mccline fight. But its still a very risky bet.

    I have followed Maskaevs career for a while now and the one thing I can tell you is that often times in fights he develops tunnel vision and is open to wide hooks which knock him out cuz he doesn't see them coming. This has happend many times, ex. Tua, Whitaker, Sanders, and Kirk Johnson. Now his fighting Sam Peter, what kind of punches does Sam Peter spcialize in? Wide powerful hooks. What punches is Sam Peter immune to? Staight jabs and straight rights proven in the Klitschko fight. If Wlads straight punches didn't KO Peter neither will Maskaevs.

    So when you analyze all the data, you come to the conclusion that Peter has the weapon that Maskaev has fallen victim to many times, and at the same time Peter is immune to Maskaevs main aresenal. So you basically narrow your bet down to whether Peter will catch Maskaev in 36 minutes of fighting. I say theres a good chance, specially taking into consideration Maskaevs age (39) and lack of activity (last fought 12/10/06). By fight night he will have been inactive for 14 months.
     
    Charles White likes this.
  14. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    thanks for the input, i'll have to download their last fights and analyze them
     
  15. Sweet Scientist

    Sweet Scientist Member Full Member

    253
    0
    May 21, 2007
    I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with Hrak here. A bet on Maskaev at +300 gives you a great shot at riding the money train. Peter is totally overrated and regardless of what kind of punches you throw, how about we talk power?

    Maskaev, for all his short comings, is a hard ass puncher. Harder than Jameel, who dropped Peter a couple of times. And unlike Mccline, Maskaev knows how to finish your ass.

    EDIT: Wlad was still in the process of becoming Wlad 2.0 when they fought. Even at that, he had Peter on wackyrubber legs at one point. Plus Peter threw some punches that...well...see my avatar.