right now its maskaev at +300 and Peter -450. i dont think the odds will get any better for Oleg than they are now. I got -200 odds on mayweather last weekend, put down $200 and made $100. any advice? thanks in advance
some of the other fights they have odds for: Alex Arthur -1500 Stephen Foster +700 Marco Huck -275 Steve Cunningham +215 Paul Malignaggi -450 Herman Ngoudjo +300 Roy Jones Jr -325 Felix Trinidad +250 Cory Spinks -450 Verno Phillips +300 Mike Mollo -115 Andrew Golota -115 Oleg Maskaev +300 Samuel Peter-450 Kelly Pavlik-240 Jermain Taylor +190 Wladimir Klitshko-600 Sultan Ibragimov +400 Manny Pacquiao-140 Juan Manuel Marquez+110
It's actually not a bad bet to take. I wouldn't bet on Maskaev since I believe he will be KO'd early, but Peter showed his vulnerabilities against McCline. If he was in that kind of trouble with Maskaev, he would have been stopped.
Very foolish to bet on an old, no legs, glass jawed fighter who also would not be at any version of a 'stylistic advantage'.
From that list, Ngoudjo, Trinidad, Oleg and Taylor all see like pretty good bets to me (note that's different from "I think they're going to win"). Mollo/Golota is intersting - even bookies have no clue what to do with the Foul Pole.
Look at the current moment its a safer bet then it was before the Mccline fight. But its still a very risky bet. I have followed Maskaevs career for a while now and the one thing I can tell you is that often times in fights he develops tunnel vision and is open to wide hooks which knock him out cuz he doesn't see them coming. This has happend many times, ex. Tua, Whitaker, Sanders, and Kirk Johnson. Now his fighting Sam Peter, what kind of punches does Sam Peter spcialize in? Wide powerful hooks. What punches is Sam Peter immune to? Staight jabs and straight rights proven in the Klitschko fight. If Wlads straight punches didn't KO Peter neither will Maskaevs. So when you analyze all the data, you come to the conclusion that Peter has the weapon that Maskaev has fallen victim to many times, and at the same time Peter is immune to Maskaevs main aresenal. So you basically narrow your bet down to whether Peter will catch Maskaev in 36 minutes of fighting. I say theres a good chance, specially taking into consideration Maskaevs age (39) and lack of activity (last fought 12/10/06). By fight night he will have been inactive for 14 months.
I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with Hrak here. A bet on Maskaev at +300 gives you a great shot at riding the money train. Peter is totally overrated and regardless of what kind of punches you throw, how about we talk power? Maskaev, for all his short comings, is a hard ass puncher. Harder than Jameel, who dropped Peter a couple of times. And unlike Mccline, Maskaev knows how to finish your ass. EDIT: Wlad was still in the process of becoming Wlad 2.0 when they fought. Even at that, he had Peter on wackyrubber legs at one point. Plus Peter threw some punches that...well...see my avatar.