I have no doubts about it and in the first round where it was CLEAR HBO had a bias towards Bradley I knew the fix was in. Surely enough throught the fight HBO tried selling to the viewers that Bradley was "outworking" Marquez and "outboxing" Marquez but that is simply not true. He was running and landing NOTHING. His jab was nothing. A lot of it was missing. Where is the accuracy? Marquez landed his power punches @ 34% compared to Bradley 30% so where is the slickness? Marquez landing the harder more significant shots and Bradley was running the majority of the fight and LOST THE LAST THREE ROUNDS. ONE PUNCH does not win you a round just because you made him stumble. HBO is young and can be marketed so they tried to influence the audience that this was boxing but it is 100% fixed. If you watch videos of fan reactions post fight, the majority believe Marquez won and that was close and these aren't all mexican fans. It's because they were influenced by HBO agenda. This was 100% rigged.
They say the way they compose the judges is like this: 1 Judge that favors defense and/or precise counterpunching 1 Judge that favors aggression 1 Judge in the middle I think the scorecards this evening reflected this.
Look, it could have gone either way, so calling it rigged is a bit of a stretch. Bradley fought a nice technical game plan that relied on winning on points rather than giving him a beating. Did anyone really he would try the same brawling style again with an elite fighter? I watched the international broadcast with Colonel Bob Sheridan and Mario Lopez and that had despicable commentary. The colonel gave JMM just one round! The went on how great Bradley's defense was, but didn't acknowledge JMM's great defense as well. This was very much a chess match and not much really happened. JMM knew the type of fighter he was in with, so it's his own fault for not implementing a more aggressive gameplan.
Tim Bradley got credit for punches that hit glove. Wtf did he do? He landed an occasional jab and that's it.