This Forum Is Filled With Haters

Relax, write your ideas in paragraphs and with reason and you will get real posts. We have the right to be fans and critics.

For a person who hates the haters so much, you sure do some hating yourself on the posters here. Why not follow your own ideas and don't talk about something you don't respect?

 

Correct. As soon as anybody dares to say anything bad about Wlad or Vitali though, we are instantly labelled as haters.

He is scared to get hit which means its the same old story. Jab jab clinch. jab jab clinch. jab jab right hand clinch. Repeat for as long as you like. He is incredibly boring to watch. I can't think of many recognised #1 heavyweights in the history of the sport who are as bad as this guy.

 

they should just cal this site wlad side boxing. cause every thread is about him

and im not a hater. i like wlad. i cant stand his ****** fans who think hes an ALL TIME GREAT. ARE YOU FU*KING KIDDING ME?

 

I understand what your saying, there have been a few posters leave for that reason alone, some just cant take the heat when it comes to people knocking there favorite fighter.

I'm not going to lie, I got very angry after the usual poster started calling Brewster a ***** after he gave up on stool against Wlad last summer, it really hurt to see a guy that tough and brave throughout his career go out like that, and then on top of that, you have posters questioning his manhood and toughness, wouldnt they themselves couldnt last 2 seconds in the ring with Wlad without getting knocked out or giving up.

 

Je Frazier would have toget on a step stool to hit Wlad. I love Frazier. However it would be a brutal ko when Frazier gets hit by the right hand.

 

so true. how can you call a guy a ***** for getting a hellacious beating for multiple rounds like brewster did? i bet those wlad fans didnt call wlad a ***** when brewster starched him.

i dont diss fighters unless they clearly give up when they dont have to.

 

Fire,
Wlad is the best Heaviweight right now, that being said people dislike all kinds of fighters, if they have any flaws they are picked apart because they do in fact have them. That being said, their are very few fighters in the history of the sport that cannot be hated on simply because they were unbeliavably good. Three fighters come to mind that simply cannot be hated on based on their victories and accomplishments. Ali, Johnson and Robinson (not in that order) any other fighter is flawed enough to hat on based upon their losses or deficiencies. This even explains undefeated fighters being hated based upon their legacies, ALA Calzaghe. You have to admit, love them or hate em it's pretty hard to knock a fighter that goes above and beyond anyone else in their sport to prove they are just that good. Kiltchsko has already hurt himself with losses to Purity, Sanders and Brewster. Haters have plenty of ammo. Hell even Leonard suffers based upon losses to Duran, Norris and Camacho. Even his win against Hagler hurts him based upon the way he won! There is no way to win here for the Wlad fan.

 

You're undoubtedly correct in that assessment. Wlad would K.O.
a great many top fighters from the 70's. 80's and 90's. in under
two minutes. There would be lots of Austin like blowouts if the
massive Wlad were to go back somehow and feast on alot of
those glorified cruiserweights.

 

have some respect jag off. glorified cruisers? lol ali was like 215-220. foreman was around the same. thats 20 pounds over cruiser. technically 30 since cruiser was 190 for a long time