This Is An Illustration of Why Compubox #'s Should Be Banished

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by acb, Apr 27, 2008.


  1. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Look at this GIF. Quick... how many punches just landed for each fighter?

    http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c217/natas206/hopcalz-1.gif

    The correct answer is that 5 are thrown by Calzaghe, and 1 semi lands, while 2 are thrown by Bernard and 1 lands.

    But this is a slow motion replay on a loop and is a close up shot. Place yourself in the position of someone suposedly counting punches in the audience with bad angles and the distractions of the atmosphere and you have a ridiculously corrupted mechanism for measuring success.
     
  2. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
  3. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    Wow, Joe looks like such a douche.
     
  4. Thirdgeary

    Thirdgeary Clincher Full Member

    1,053
    16
    Oct 2, 2006
    Nice headbutt by Nard in there too.
     
  5. LeadLeftHook

    LeadLeftHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,853
    1
    Apr 4, 2007
    Hopkins landed cleaner harder punches for sure. Joe barely landed any clean punch, most of them being arm punches that hit air or hit Hopkins shoulders and gloves. Joe just won by being more active of the two without landing any thing significant the entire fight.

    Compubox numbers in that fight are indeed very misleading. But judges dont use compubox numbers in scoring so its a non factor in the decision.
     
  6. LeadLeftHook

    LeadLeftHook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,853
    1
    Apr 4, 2007
    In this case thats how the entire fight went.
     
  7. magnificentdave

    magnificentdave Constant Reminder Full Member

    1,788
    1
    Sep 14, 2006
    that one punch didn't semi land, it landed on Hopkins' arm
     
  8. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    But compubox numbers factor heavily into public perception and are very misleading to the average fan who looks to the numbers game (like most all other sports) to derive a winner. Its the first thing that is analyzed after a big fight- Lampley leads directly into these numbers as if they are accurate or mean something more than they really do on a whole.
     
  9. magnificentdave

    magnificentdave Constant Reminder Full Member

    1,788
    1
    Sep 14, 2006
    I don't think the fight is as simple as the classic quality over quantity aspect. It steps out of that question and into another dimension--

    the reality of the punches.

    It looks like somebody went in and digitally edited the film.

    Whenever Calzaghe threw a punch, they deleted the parts where he followed through or appeared to have intended to land the punch, had he thrown it.
     
  10. acb

    acb De Camaguey... Gavilan Full Member

    9,448
    4
    Jan 6, 2007
    Due to the angle of the camera, I couldn't tell if it landed on his upper shoulder or the jaw... or a bit of both.
     
  11. elgrancampeon

    elgrancampeon Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Feb 28, 2008
    Hopkins has a good counter Heabutt followed by a right.
     
  12. doomeddisciple

    doomeddisciple Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,001
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    He's not.

    He's showing that Compubox is not exactly reliable.

    The mere mathematics of counting the number of punches does not fit with the pro boxing scoring mechanic.

    ie: Chris Byrd lands 40 jabs. David Tua lands one left hook - now mathematically - 40 is a lot more than 1. Personally - I'll take the 40 over the one!
     
  13. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ive never put much stock in compubox. All it every seems to me is like a little thing Jim Lampley and HBO use to make there favorites look better or something fans use to scream robbery all the time. Example according to compubox DLH raped Mosley in the rematch but if you really watch the fight and not get caught up in Lampleys nuthugging or the crowd noise you will see what the judges,press judges,ringside fighters seen and thats DLH throwing shots missing all of them and Shane landing loud,thudding power shots which is one of the criteria for scoring a fight clean,effective punching.
     
  14. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    I like both parts of your post you said what ive been trying to say over a 3 period. That is that sure Hopkins was landing the cleaner and probablly harder punches agianst Calzaghe just like he did vs Taylor in both fights and made them miss alot but he just doesnt throw enough. I mean lets look at it in those 3 particular Hopkins fights hed throw lets say about 15 punches a round landing 8-9 clean right hands which is nice but his opponet will be throwing 50-60 punches overall every round which leaves a bigger impression on the judges because that mean is actually doing more in the fight. I also like your last part compubox isnt used in scoring fights the judges dont get to see the numbers during the fights and cant use it so it is a non factor and therefore I dont see why the thread starter thinks it should be banished. Its like saying the unoffical judge Harold Lederman or the press judges should be banished because there scores arent offical.
     
  15. maciek4

    maciek4 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,407
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Of course quality over quantity but quality has to be significant. You cant land 2-3 clean punches a round and expect the judges to give you the round.