This is How to FIX the Judging

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Peterp, Sep 16, 2018.


  1. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,620
    Nov 9, 2015

    No because the fighter with the most number of fans would never get an unfair advantage.... lol
     
    Badbot likes this.
  2. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things.

    51,097
    40,923
    Apr 17, 2011
    5 judges is where it's at.
    Maybe reshape the 10 point system. It's ridiculous just how often a KD causes a 3 point swing.

    But most of all, fix the judges. Make sure they are properly schooled and test them to see their adequacy as a judge.
     
  3. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,269
    Jun 28, 2016
    One independent body would help not unlike how they set about cricket with neutral umpires and life bans for those caught fixing matches,helped the sport no end.
    One other massive change in cricket was the right to appeal decisions with a respected third umpire removed from the game in his own room with cameras,it’s taken the animosity out of the game as 99% of it was to do with bad decisions or human error.

    I realise boxing is a different sport but I’m sure the boxers themselves just want fair decisions so re last night I’m not sure there would of been grounds for a change of decision but that first fight was agreed by a big consensus that it was wrong and could of been cleared up within half hour I believe.
    Surely though common sense would dictate that judges are dealt with by a highly respected individual or individuals and that they are not named before the fight negating any suspicion of foul play.
    Let’s not single out Canelo either as my opinion of that other famous A side boxer AJ went down after seeing the antics in that Parker fight.......all A side stuff is a cancer to the sport,can’t tell you how impressed I was when Spence fought Brook in the U.K.,would love to see Canelo win outside of Vegas.
     
  4. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,269
    Jun 28, 2016
    There’s another scenario that was mentioned re Byrd in that her card was so bad it was actually too ridiculous to be corrupt and that it’s quite possible she wanted to impress one of the biggest promoters in the sport and get any future jobs and in that she failed as Oscar had a lot of questions to answer.
    How much do they get paid and is it enough?
     
  5. the factor

    the factor Active Member banned Full Member

    694
    340
    Sep 13, 2014
    These guys don't put much thought into their wild ideas on how to revolutionize judging.
     
  6. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,466
    10,699
    Oct 1, 2011
    Negative! Terrible idea! 50 judges? LOL the cost of judges would be more than the purse. SMH. Here's the best way. 9 judges in sound proof rooms with cameras on all 4 sides of the ring. They can hit a button that cuts a 10 second time period out to review if there is a question about a foul, a flurry or something like that. During the fight a representitive from both sides will monitor the judges quarters. After the fight a rep from the commission will have the 9 judges place their score cards in the box in front of the reps from the fighters. At that point, the rep from the commission and the fighters will carry the box to the ring, were the announcer will randomly pull 3 cards out and read the results.
     
  7. spiderricco

    spiderricco Member Full Member

    321
    24
    Feb 25, 2006
    Real fight fans know who the winner is so we don't need no stinkin judges.
     
  8. boxingfanatical

    boxingfanatical Member Full Member

    368
    91
    May 3, 2014
    Who the hell is gonna pay 50 judges?
     
    Blackclouds likes this.
  9. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,419
    39,872
    Jan 7, 2014
    Our taxes.
     
  10. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,553
    8,119
    Sep 2, 2011
    Well I think 3 judges is kind of a tradition that will be hard to break through, but I get your point and I agree, the more people scoring, it'd be harder to coordinate a bribery and with a bigger "sample size" you remove some of the subjectivity.

    It'd be a welcome change in my eyes but yeah, I don't think it's totally feasible but perhaps 50 is overkill, they could start with 20 or something.
     
  11. Badgeronimous

    Badgeronimous Will you stand? Full Member

    655
    57
    Nov 8, 2008
    I do think for world title fights, 1 judge per side of the ring and 1 TV judge, would make sense.

    Makes a bogus card much less influencial, and at the top level, an extra 2 judges are not going to affect things too much.
     
  12. Smudge_

    Smudge_ Teak tough Full Member

    2,247
    3,254
    Jan 23, 2018
    Sorry but I think that's a stupid idea. As I said, fights would be getting decided on popularity. You think a home town crowd is gonna vote for their own fighter to lose in a close fight? And that's on the assumption that everybody in the crowd knows how to score a fight properly. Which is unlikely.
     
  13. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,460
    29,331
    Jan 18, 2010
    I thought judging in boxing has always been fixed.
     
  14. Geo1122

    Geo1122 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    1,002
    Jul 7, 2017
    3 judges per round, sat in a booth somewhere. So that totals 36 judges.

    After a round the 3 judges allocated to that round have 10 minutes to rewatch it in slow motion from various angles.

    Sure, they’d be a 10 minute delay at the end of the fight, but I guarantee you’ll see better scorecards.
     
  15. Felix Sanchez

    Felix Sanchez Active Member Full Member

    1,114
    606
    Mar 5, 2006
    People want to see results, they haven't paid good money to attend a fight to read who won the day after.