Foreman is easily one of the best HWs of all time easily and Pacquiao is one of the best fighters of all time himself. few fighters in recent history have climbed weights like him and Floyd as well and I've also seen verrrrry few fighters recover from such a KO and come back and beat good fighters with success
Since we are off the subject of GG, I'll ask this question. What happened when both fought Ali and Floyd?:rofl
Dude a loss doesn't define a fighters whole career and "expose them". Just because Foreman lost to Ali and PAC lost to Floyd it doesn't seem their whole career worthless. It's one fight and styles make fights.
GGG is a middleweight 160 pounds I don't think there is a 160 pound fighter that has a chance of beating him. I admire David Lemieux for stepping up to the plate when none of the other so called elite find excuses not to. It should be an exciting fight
Problem with your formula is the fact that GGG is a grade A boxer puncher not a slugger. He is the better boxer in there.
Foreman lost because Ali employed good defense and came back with really hard punches. Pacquiao lost because he couldn't land enough punches which may have had a lot do with him being well past his prime.
Muhammad Ali was indeed one of the best ever in the sport, if not THE BEST!! But Mayweather??? Take away the NSAC / USADA / Vegas corruption that protected his bogus 0. Plus the dark cloud of suspicion he's been using PED's all along & what do you have left???? A very talented cowardly prima donna who cannot FIGHT!!! a lick He's not worthy to carry Ali's jockstrap
Foreman lost because his mostly undisciplined style got taken advantage of by the craftier, smarter, more experienced Ali. Pacquiao lost because he fought an extremely sharp defensive fighter that made him ineffective for most of the fight. What's your point?
Back him up. Throw lots is punches, faster & harder. Physically manhandle him. Hurt him early. Don't give him room to punch or breath. Do not hesitate at all. Be stronger and tougher than him.