This is why Pac deserves a rematch.

:deal

 

how come the press hasn't gone to town on this?
especially the scale of the fight.
unless its just the uk it hasnt been a 'massive' thing.

especially with all the russian athletics bans and the stuff with povetkin.

 

Why hasn't Arum or Roach made a big stink about this? If they felt that their fighter was wronged, I can't imagine either one of them staying quiet.

 

What I am saying is "normal" people have moved on from this. It doesn't impact my life one way or the other so I can care less. It must have directly impacted your life and that's why you can't let it go.

 

I'm British so I have no skin in the game so to speak but I'm a boxing fan.

I was like many others wanted Mayweather Vs Pacquiao for so many years and we finally got it. Now, it was way past both their primes in my opinion but we got it and it was hyped to the extreme and rightly so.

It was a huge let down, the fight was boring, the aftermath was bitter and got so annoying with talk of injuries, IV's and rematches.

It's gone, it's over, there really is not need to see a rematch unless you are a Pacquiao fan who can't accept he got beaten.

Let it go.

 

Strange that Arum and Roach, and even Pac, have moved on from this farce of a fight ( and they had a direct stake in the outcome) and you can't. I want to end the discussion because I have heard it ad nauseam and I feel it is just a waste of time. You can continue with your conspiracy theories, I have already spent more time on this subject than I wanted.

 

The floyd fight was close yes floyd outpointed him easy but there wasn't much action in the fight at all really it was very very dull with a lack of clean shots landing from both fighters.

This is why the fight happened when it did think about it, Floyd has made every big name he fought wait and wait then he fights them when they look bad and slower on the decline before fighting him.

Most of the "names" Floyd fought looked like **** before they fought him but still Floyds just a better fighter than pacman anyway.
I just don't like that Floyd didn't fight certain fighters at their peaks or when they were in form, Canelo being an exception to this but Canelo is overrated, if you can take canelos best shot you can box circles around him all night.

Even Guerrero he goes life and death with a B level fighter PERFECT for a floyd fight, Hatton goes life and death with Collazo again ripe for the picking,Oscar he was pretty much done at the Mayorga fight but never mind, long lay off then is ripe and past prime.

So when people talk about Floyd being a cherry picker it's more about choosing to fight when the form looks in his favor.There is no prime for prime in Floyds middle to late career it's like if Barrera didn't fight Hamed and waited until Hamed was 32 years old instead and looked bad prior, yes maybe prime for prime the same result but the point is it leaves the air of doubt when it's not on form vs on form prime vs prime.

Why for exapmple did Pac vs Floyd not happen after the oscar vs pac fight or Hatton vs pac fight ? we are robbed of prime vs prime by floyd.

 

I keep hearing this so I have a question. What fighters did he miss when Fhe and said fighters were both in their primes?

 

And on top of that they said that he had this injury since 1923. What a joke![/QUOTE]

EDIT: probably it was some minor issues that he planned to fix when he had time for it. But not a serious enough injury to impact your boxing. Excuses everywhere.[/quote]

Since 1923 ?? Dang how old is Manny ??

 

Answer is simple

This content is protected

 

There should be a rematch with neutral judges, referee, boxing commission, etc.

 

With only one arm...? Don't have to imagine it when its actually history right?

And VADA with no effing IV bags or retroactive TUEs.