Barrera was Prime that in itself is enough for me. This idiot saying Marco wasnt Prime is speaking out of his ass. Heres a look at Barrera',Morales and Marquez last 5 fights before fighting Pacman. BARRERA Hamed Won UD Sanchez Won TKO Morales Won UD Tapia Won UD Kelley Won KO 4 Barrera was still way in his Prime. MORALES Chavez Won UD Hernandez Won UD Barrera Lost MD Pacquiao Won UD Raheem Lost UD Morales had never been stopped even though he lost close fights to Barrera and Raheem but Pacman destroyed him. Then they all said Morales was shot. MARQUEZ John Lost UD Jandeang Won TKO 7 Jaca Won KO 9 Barrera Won UD Juarez Won UD Now Marquez had just beat Barrera and a Prime Rocky Juarez. Now no offense but Barrera was as Prime as you get as a fighter. And Pacman destroyed him. Hamed
For the record Barrera after the 1st Pacman fight had just turned 30. I wouldnt call that Past his Prime after he had just nailed Hamed Morales and Tapia. He was the perfect age i feel. Most fighters when there 30 are a perfect age for the experiance has caught up with there talent and pyhsical parts of there Peaks. It ****'s me off that a guy like Pacman comes along and there treating him Like Pavlik now. Its a joke.
Point out where I said that no one should give Pac credit, and I'll shut the **** up. I'm voicing my opinion and pointing out facts that I believe are correct. I never said these are facts that everyone needs to believe and that they are undisputable facts. You are talking as if Pac beat a prime Morales and Barrera. As I said, I believe Morales and Barrera were past-their-physical peaks when Pac came along. I pointed out observations on why I believe so and you come on here telling me to **** off. It's common to see a fighter come along and beat a HOF'er when that HOF'er has been in countless wars and the up-and-comer is a young and hungry fighter. Let me make it simpler. Lets say Pac were to fight Hatton and Mayweather, and beat them both after brutal wars. Then a young and hungry fighter, who also happens to be a good fighter, comes in and whoops Pac. Would you say that fighter beat a prime Pac? I wouldn't. Anyhow, I stand by what I said, and you can agree or disagree. Bottom line is that is my opinion and you don't have to like it.
Well Morales did manage to win the first fight which was a little bit easier to score than both Marquez fights. You will see much improvement in Pacs game during the rematch.
Everybody that Pac has beaten were shot... after pac beats the living **** out of hatton he'll be shot too! lol When everything is said and done pac will end up higher than the great PBF in ATG rankings.
Morales was fading in that fight, and it was plain to see. If Pac was so improved, he should have beaten an older Marquez convincingly, and he didn't.
And the THREAD STARTER CLAIMS he is a PACFAN!?! You are entitled to your own opinion but you don't have to lie and say you are a pac fan coz you are NOT! ok?!
only a few die-hard fans over-rate him in these forums. but generally, he is still under-rated by most boxing fans here.
JMM's resume compared to pac is ****! ****en overrated his ticket to stardom was his draw and lost to pac. True story... :deal His notable wins were againts past prime MAB (got whooped and KD) and Grand Papa Casa! :yep
The funny thing is Barrera is going to the HOF Morales is going to the HOF Marquez will 90% im sure be going to the HOF Dela Hoya will be going to the HOF And the one thing they all have in common they got beaten by Pacman. It doesnt mean **** if Morales was one fight past his best because we the true fans know for fact that Barrera who is better than Morales i feel got his ass handed to him by Pacman in his Prime. We witnessed it. We witnessed Pacman a 4/1 underdog against Dela Hoya hand Dela Hoya his worse ass whupping ever. Its so funny this ****. I hope Pacman beats the **** out of Hatton then Juan Diaz then PBF that might shut a few up.
Its not getting out of hand. Except for ridiculous threads like Pac vs Cotto, he deserves all the credit he is getting RIGHT NOW. A credit, mind you, which has looooooong been overdue ever since he beat MAB in 2003. Lets face facts shall we, Pac is being UNderrated even now instead of overrated. From analyzing his wins to pitting him in fantasy matchups, Pac always get the short end of the stick. ALWAYS. People who give him full credit for his wins and objectively analyze his standing among mythical matchups are very rare in this forum. You know it, I know it, everybody knows it. Pac was, is and will continue to be underrated around here parts and there's nothing anyone can do anything about it. No offense RingKing but I believe your being subjective with this "getting out of hand" stuff. What you seem to be doing is selectively picking out threads that seem to "overrate" Pac and use that as a reason to rant about him. While, at the same time, completely ignoring the many other threads that underrate Pac. And as far as those "past their prime" fighters that Pac beat. I agree with BoppaZoo, MAB in 2003 was very much in his prime. There's no evidence that he was past prime nor shot. Your "prePac wars" don't hold much water IMO since after the beating from Pac, Marco took on Erik the 3rd time, where he was the BIG underdog, and proceeded to beat Morales PROVING most people wrong, then he went on a 4 year winning streak which only stopped when he faced JMM, and even then he gave JMM everything he could handle and was very compettitve almost every step of the way. That's not something a past prime fighter does mate. JMM was and is still in his prime and many people here(including me) thought Pac beat him.
The problem is with all these "objective" fans saying that Pac fought all these legends past their prime (or shot in alot of cases) is that coming into those fights no one would've labeled those fighters as being so. MAB was a 4-1 favorite the first time. EM was also the favorite in his rematch, same with ODLH. They all somehow became "shot" after Pac whitewashes them. See a common theme here? It's not as if Pac was prime either the first time he fought alot of these guys. You have to look at both sides of the coin.I highly doubt the EM that first fought Pac would stand much of a chance to today's version of Pac. My point is by calling these guys shot, Pac is actually being underrated. Past prime or not, it is the manner in which Pac beat these guys that he deserves all the accolades.
I agree with the Cotto issue, I believe Cotto is too strong for him (although one never knows what can happen in a ring). But to say Pac hasn't been tested? Are you serious? You are speaking as if he's a slouch like Bobby Pacquiao. I'm not saying he's a Ray Robinson or a top 5 ATG but I think we should give the guy his due credit. Who does he have to fight then to prove he's the best p4p? Wlad or Vitali? Before the DLH fight few people gave him a chance and now they say he just was lucky Oscar was weight-drained. Who has beaten better competition P4P in the last couple of years than Manny? IMO, he has fought better competition than PBF (im not saying he's better than floyd) and many others. If you say Manny is not tested then I'll say that Floyd is even less tested. Let's hope then that PBF fights Cotto, Paul Williams, Tony Margarito, heck, even shane mosley. If not , I'll anxiously await for a Pac-PBF fight. True that floyd has all the tools to prevail but to say it will be a shutout or an embarrassment is incorrect IMO. We should never underestimate Manny.