This Scoring Sucks Big Time

0.0. it was a close fight lol could of gone either way. but glad Estrada won I don't like cuadras much lol.

 

Huh?

Cuadras lit Estrada up all night until he started to fade in the second half and got caught. You can't take away points from Cuadras for being sort of featherfisted.

 

lol... no cudras won atleast 3 of the first 5 . probably 4 and you could even argue 5.

 

0.0 1 of the first 5... that's impossible lmao... but okay. I don't like cudras but even I had him ahead 4-1 or 3-2 after 5 lol.

 

I know :

I know oh well some people judge different I guess

 

That score is fair for either man... It was a close fight.

 

The scores were actually perfect. A legit argument could have been made for either man. It really came to the last round and I thought Estrada won it ever so slightly.

 

I gave Cuadras 5 rounds, but had Estrada winning. Cuadras was bigger, more active, and threw big eye-catching punches. That's all most people see. It's a lot easier to see sloppy hay makers than a slight block or deflection off a glove or elbow. I think a lot of people will also score more heavily for the bigger fighter, assuming that his punches do more damage and are worth more than crisp short shots.

The biggest problem with most people's judging lately appears to be a lack of basic understanding for how punches are blocked or deflected. They don't look closely. They only see who is throwing a lot. Also, Estrada's face seemed to mark up more than Cuadras' did, so some people score based on physical appearances such as blood and bruises.