This victory gives nothing to Lomachenko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NaiKoN, Dec 9, 2017.


  1. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,611
    34,431
    Jun 23, 2005
    Gamboa was not 37 when he fought Crawford was he?
     
    BlizzyBlizz likes this.
  2. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Yeah he was. He was pfp number 1 until he retired.
     
  3. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    No he wasn't, he also wasn't listed top 5 p4p, one of the most avoided fighters of his generation like Rigo.
     
  4. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Salido was bettering Loma. Lmao. ****en alt.
     
  5. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Did Rigo lose to Salido?
     
  6. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    And Manny took his spot.
     
  7. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    Loma lost to Salido, what relevance is it to my original point?
     
    Last edited: Dec 11, 2017
  8. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    You had no point.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  9. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    That's not how pfp rankings work. You're not given that status. That's something you have to earn. Pac was always #2.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  10. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    Go back and read lil man, stop deviating from my original statement. Short attention span syndrome ;)
     
  11. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,795
    15,372
    Jul 25, 2014
    Was he not? I'm pretty sure Gamboa was listed p4p top 5 at one point though if not definitely top 10. I mean Rigo shouldn't have been listed top 5 in 2017. A win in 2013 should not keep a p4p spot 4 years later with in-activeness and mediocre opponents.
     
  12. JohnnyDrama99

    JohnnyDrama99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,398
    903
    Nov 24, 2012
    PAC definitely earned his p4p status based on the breadth and depth of his ring performances. Floyd couldn’t be considered p4p because he retired so the next person who was on his level holding down the #2 spot was raised to the #1 spot.
     
  13. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    I don't think Gamboa was ever top 5, he was just in the top 10 if memory serves. I'm not saying I even disagree with you on Rigo's p4p standing being inflated, but the reality is he was pretty much universally considered a p4p top 5 fighter. My original point was, Loma's win over Rigo is better than TC's over Gamboa.
     
  14. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    38,795
    15,372
    Jul 25, 2014
    Nope. Rigo was 37 and moving up 2 weight classes. Gamboa had fought at 135 already. Are we forgetting how badly natural 122 pounders and below age? I wouldn't even call him a natural 122 pounder, more like a natural 118 pounder. The truth is Rigo had a great win in 2013. After that he was inactive and fought bums. He almost got stopped by Amagasa ffs if you want to bring up Gamboa's struggles.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    58,510
    77,683
    Aug 21, 2012
    My point is that it's his second fight as a professional. Hell, I tend to disregard the losses in a fighter's first 10 or so fights because he's still learning. There's no question whatsoever in my mind that if Loma rematched Salido today, that Salido would be sent home in traction. Obviously I don't really hold Hops' first loss against him.
     
    BlizzyBlizz likes this.