This video tells me Floyd beats Pac all day long

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rainmaker, Dec 27, 2010.


  1. sir axeman

    sir axeman Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,307
    159
    Jun 24, 2007
    Watching Hopkins..I could be lead to believe that! :D
     
  2. Don Q

    Don Q Active Member Full Member

    993
    0
    May 30, 2010
    You are right about southpaws. However, Manny is a sucker for counter punchers. We all know the blueprint to beat him, JMM showed the world. Those 2 fights between JMM and Pac, where much more close/competitive(considering their actual outcomes and not taking into account what most of the boxing world consider, which is that JMM won both) than Floyd vs Corley, Mitchell and Judah COMBINED.

    With this said, I think that for this particular matchup Floyd's counter punching and style > Manny's natural gift of being a southpaw. Many people think that Pac has evolved since JMM and that he is a much better fighter, but seem to forget that Floyd is on another level from JMM. To me, Floyd still has the advantage.
     
  3. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,594
    721
    Aug 23, 2010
    :deal
     
  4. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    this pretty much sums it up....great post
     
  5. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    Great video. If that guy only hits the gloves of Floyd, then there's no way that Pac can hit Floyd.
     
  6. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Re-quote for emphasis.

    "not taking into account what most of the boxing world consider, which is that JMM won both"

    Repost again Pacman vs JMM fight and MaestroBoxing clips on Pacman and its a done deal.
     
  7. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    unbelievable
     
  8. aramini

    aramini Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    7
    Sep 15, 2004
    There is something that Floyd talks about that makes him effective and that makes Pac effective, its the broken rhythm. Floyd, from an external viewpoint, looks predictable because when someone comes forward, he goes back, but in slowmotion you see the subtle offensive alterations and rhythm fluctuations that put him on another level than most opponents.

    This is why Pac is effective too, but it is with his offense. It is stacatto and rapid burst but it is offbeat. he throws his combos from different starting points and has accuracy, and this broken rhythm makes it very hard to adapt to his speed. There are plenty of fast guys, but their offense is not as unpredictable as that herky jerky randomness that makes Pac successful.
     
  9. jmmpbf

    jmmpbf Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    0
    Aug 25, 2010

    Make sense, but when I see pac fights, its always in rhythm because the opponents, rarely throw back, because they fear pacs power, meaning they're in defensive mode most of the time, and arent moving out the way or have no skills to do so. So it seems like Pac can do whatever he wants to opponents, because hes opponents didnt get him off rhythm to counter or move out the way, it shows how talented Pac is, but it also shows how hes opponents were picked correctly for hes style. For me, Marquez kept moving and not giving Pacquiao that many opportunities to bull rush, and hes movement took away hes angles to throw 4-6 punch combos, there was only a trade when Marquez stood still, plus hes flat footed.
     
  10. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    I'm not talking about PEDs or challenging how much you know about boxing, right now. The question is, is he a vastly different fighter, in terms of skill, from what he was in 3/2008? IMO...NO.

    Skeleton? Manny fought the MAJORITY of his career at 130 and below. So, what you are saying is that he was ALWAYS a "skeleton", at those weights. Interesting. Since he was so uncomfortable at the weight, then why did he force Morales to come in at 130, for the rematches, when he and Manny could've fought at a more "comfortable" weight, for both guys. Morales was the "skeleton", in those fights...not Manny. He is the one who had issues making that weight, and remaining effective...not Manny.

    Weight was not the issue in either fight against JMM. JMM's skill and heart was the issue. If Pac has improved (skill-wise) at all, it is only slightly, since the second fight. And since he hasn't fought a comparably skilled fighter since, we don't know how much. His opposition since JMM 2, has been tailor made, like a Brooks Brothers suit.

    Let me guess when you saw it all come together...either 3 months after the JMM rematch against Diaz or 9 months later against a shot, weight drained ODLH. Right? :think
     
  11. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Not a skeleton? Look at pacman pic during their second fight. And please we're talking about JMM, stop moving the pole. Pacman was starving himself and not taking any fluid close to weighing day just to make the weight even during Morales days.

    That clip was from MaestroBoxing a known bias pacman critic. Do you honeslty believe I would waste my time watching such clip.

    ODLH weight drained himself, it wasn't pacman who called the shot. ODLH cherry picked pacman and got blown bigtime.

    I have no problem unbiased boxing expert dissect pacman style or improvement. You know me, I take it like how a gentelman should.

    I've been following pacman since 1996 and watched all his fight. Not just his fight with Barerra, Morales who all of you claimed shot or over the hill.

    Tailor made? Pacman must be so ****ing lame? Tailor made againts shot and over the hill fighters. :yep
     
  12. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010

    I don't care about what he looks like three weight classes above 130. He competed at 130 for a number of years, because, he could make the weight and be effective. NO EXCUSES. If it was so hard...he should've moved up A LOT sooner. Weight is not the reason those fights with JMM were so competitive. JMM is a smarter fighter than Manny. That is why they were so closely contested. Manny would have all the same physical advantages now that he had back in 2008. But, JMM would still be the smarter fighter. It just is what it is. I contend that Manny's has not improved, considerably, if at all, skill-wise, since that second fight with JMM. He was as "complete" then, as he is now.
     
  13. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    Why would I even make excuses on pacmans weight, he won that fight.

    Smarter? Manny won for crying out loud.

    Its just what it is? Manny won.

    Manny was already complete during their second fight? Think and analyze from a neutral point of view.

    If JMM is better and smarter than pacman the we can conclude the Marquez can obliterate ODLH, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, and Margo at higher weight.

    Don't start making excuses on JMM being small, old, or can't compete at 147lbs. I'm just deducting from your point of reasoning.
     
  14. Leonard

    Leonard Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,225
    15
    Sep 19, 2009
    pac was relying too much on his left hand even in the second jmm fight. i've noticed, he never used his right that much. he practically held his own against one of the best counterpunchers today using mostly his only his left hand. if not for the difference in size and power, i see jmm still giving pac problems, but i see pac doing a lot better.
     
  15. Waaapscht

    Waaapscht New Member Full Member

    92
    0
    Apr 21, 2010
    It happened when all the PEDs talk started. If pac didn't greatly improve as a fighter, what was with all the PEDs talk? This doesn't make any sense at all. Did he or did he not improve? If not, what is with the PEDs accusastions?