This was not a robbery; it was a close fight that could of gone either way.

i have no problem with people sayin jmm won the 3rd fight with pac but to compae it to last night's fight is just ******ed....this fight was'nt even close...

 

Manny looked slow, his punches weren't as explosive as they were back in 2009-2010, he wasn't the same athletic and frenetic boxer who moved constantly and was hard to hit. But he won that fight against bradley by a great margin. the only round he clearly lost was the 10th round where he hardly threw any punches at all (very uncharacteristic of Manny).

There is no doubt, Pac is past his prime and is no longer the same fighter who topped the world's P4P rankings. He's had countless wars in the rings mostly against legends like himself. He's had an impressive resume and a very long career. Bradley was the young marquee fighter who is vying to replace the aging Pacquiao. He won but his victory was a travesty to anyone who knows how to judge a fight.

 

Listen, I like Marquez as much as the next guy and think he deserves to have at least one win vs. Pacquaio on his record - but to bring that bitterness over into this fight and claim Bradley deserved the nod or even a draw is patently ridiculous and uncalled for. This was about as clear as robberies come. Pacquiao may have taken his foot slightly off the gas in the last rounds, but Bradley never put his foot on that gas pedal at all. It was 9-3 Pacquiao and it was neither hard to score this fight, nor was it close.

 

it's so ridiculous that i can't even get mad.

i've seen so many filipinos get robbed in places like thailand and korea that things like this just make me laugh and move on.

you and me both know what happened...and did you see how pac just shrugged it off? :verysad

 

JMMs fans who cant seem to stop crying since time immemorial can do the same.

 

this was a fight you had to watch on mute or the britsh broadcast.jim lampley dick rode the whole fight and none of the replays showed bradley landing punches he landed.i had pac man winning 8rds to 4rds. but im bout to watch it again.

 

Pretty much how I saw it, I had Bradley winning clearly though.

 

He now knows how it feels, how can he complain when he robbed marquez last november.:yep

 

I agree it was close. Pac showed poor performance time to hang those gloves and concentrate more on politics and religion.

 

i had it 115-114 pac.

2,5,7even,9,10,12 bradley

1,3,4,6,7even, 8, 11 pac

 

with that post you again exemplified the steeotypical *****.

so, you're suggesting that

This content is protected

robbed jmm, yet

This content is protected

is unable to rob bradley??

 

Cotto vs Mayweather is way much closer than this fight!

 

/thread

 

Even though he was losing the early rounds Bradely was looking good going to the body and moving until he rolled his ankle in the fourth then was immobile and didn't have much pop anymore. I'm very interesting at what he can do in the rematch.

 

it's not a robbery when it's competitive like pac marquez. this fight wasn't even competitive. bradley was outclassed the whole fight. now that's a robbery.