This Weeks Analysis Of Jim Watt Thread

I like the crowd noises, if there was a way to axe the commentary and keep the atmosphere then I'd be on it.

 

I normally like Watt, but he was off form for me this week. He was more repetitive than normal in the Bellew fight, and he seemed to be scoring the Murray Mitchell fight all wrong.

Worst of all was a comment he made just before the Burns v Cook fiasco. He said something about how Ricky would be glad to be fighting Nicky Cook as he was a hard opponent. WTF?

 

Teddy Atlas is the best commentator in the sport.

 

I knew you'd say that, you use his material often enough!

 

You're making yourself available for an e-beating.

 

:good

 

I like him but he sometimes goes off on a complete tangent! Gives more technical and mental insight than probably any other though. Also passionate and opinionated. Not to everyone's taste though.

 

Ya reckon?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oP5AIHEkZSQ[/ame]

 

Yeah, he can go "off on one" but nine times out of ten if he says a fighter has a certain technical strength or weakness then it turns out to be right.

 

9.9 times out of 10*























*Except anything to do with Pacquiao or Klitschko.

 

yep, 9.9. Its weird about the Pac thing he has!!

 

Not only that, but normally how the fight is won and lost.

 

Probably one of the few times he's been wrong about a fighter and he's refused to back down ever since despite overwhelming evidence, in true warrior spirit

 

He uses a lot of analogies which annoys me somewhat, but then that could be because of the Fight Night games

-------

Who is the black guy that does the Amateur coverage on the bbc I always thought he was good can never remember his name though :huh

 

Not Duke McKenzie then?

Give us some example of these analogies...