He would be undefeated and would beat every Mayweather opponent with greater ease and destruction. I shudder to think of opponents like Ricky Hatton in there with a prime Hearns at 147. I imagine the results of a Cotto encounter. If Hearns were active in todays game at welter in his prime and employed the tatic of fighting only opponents he could beat, he would be in the discussion of greatest fighter ever. my point being Mayweather is a great fighter but highly overrated and only when he engages the greatest threats to his status: Pac and Martinez will we be able to gage his true greatness
ko1 ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1ko1k1ok1oko1ko1ko1ko1ko1k1oko1k1oko1k1oko1k1o1ok1ok1oko1k1o1ko k1o ko1 ko1 ko1
Dont even need to read, Tommy beats them all, and beats Floyd and Pac believe it or not EASY knocks Pac out inside 5, Floyd late stoppage possibly UD!
the point being that Hearns engaged the best of his generation at the elite level so we are better able to gage his true greatness, Mayweather has not, yet many claim he may top 10 atg material or the greatest ever? I say it is an unmerited status. Its not about the record or the o losses but the quality of opposition at the elite level.
the longer a fan has been following boxing the more informed the rapport, many Money fans have no idea who Curry is! besides it being an Indian condiment.
How can a guy with so many critics who claim he's overrated possibly be overrated? If you want to talk overrated, look at Mayweather's chief rival. He's been fighting the same level of opposition as Mayweather with a fraction of criticism.