Thomas Hearns v Virgil Hill

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Robbi, Apr 27, 2013.


  1. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    Can't believe this fight was 22 years ago :shock: A fantastic boxing display by a non prime Hearns at an un-natural weight :good
     
  2. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    The 80s light heavies were a pretty unspectacular group, looking back at the decade as a whole.

    Qawi moved up in weight\burned out so quickly and it was basically just Spinks and a lot of mediocre to solid fighters right up until the end of the decade.Nobody who really stood out as a very good talent.A lot of the 2nd tier\lower half of the top ten sort of contenders and title challengers from previous decades that didn't get much time inthe spotlight would have been top fighters and champions in this era.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    It is a great win on paper, coming up from WW beating a LHW champ in the middle of his 10 years as champ. Hearns carried 175 pretty well though and a not so aggressive technician who he has height/reach was always his ideal stylistic match up. Still a great win really though.

    1 of his top 3 wins? Maybe, I'd have the Leonard draw as 1, then probably Benitez, then it's between Hill, Cuevas and Duran I think.
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Hearns showed a great aptitude to move between the weights during his career.He seemed easily able to fight between 154 and 170'ish and did so in back to back fights against Medel, Dewitt, Andries then back to 160 again.

    Even immediately after the leonard bout, before he established himself at 154 he had been looking filled out in tuneups weighting around 157 against Singletary, Sutherland etc.