Thomas Hearns vs Mike McCallum at 154

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by emallini, Mar 7, 2011.


  1. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,535
    Mar 16, 2008
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    I think Hearns. Much of the talk about Hearns and McCallum was made after Mike knocked out Curry in 1987. At that point Hearns had lost to Hagler and started to diminish and fight brawls. But the Hearns prior to Hagler at 154 was a fast guy who could box and punch and either outbox great boxers Benitez or knock out Duran. I think Hearns wins a UD at 154 prior to 1985. After 1985 like when he fought Mark Medal he struggles with McCallum
     
  3. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    I think McCallum has a good shot in this bout. Durable, strong, and a shifty counter puncher who went to the body, McCallum can withstand Hearns' early onslaught and settle into grinding Chess match. Wearing Hearns down, who could be fragile and Chinny at times, McCallum had the power to KO anyone. And this could be another KO loss for Hearns.
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,060
    6,276
    Jan 22, 2009
    I agree completely.Even though I like and respect Tommy-I respect McCallum but I don't like him-I believe(as you put)that Mike was far more durable.And I believe that would be the difference.
     
  5. BarryWashington

    BarryWashington New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Nov 15, 2010
    mccallum - no question

    emanuel steward will let you tell it himself if
    you ever got to meet him :good

    hearns at 147-154 was a beast, but, mccallum
    would take him out late.
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,003
    8,736
    Jul 15, 2008
    McCallum stops Hearns ..
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    79
    Sep 3, 2007
    Hearns by UD

    Tommy has the power to make McCallum respect him enough to be wary of going inside & I see Tommy outboxing him from the outside for the majority of the fight tbh. He`s just a better boxer IMO.
     
  8. BarryWashington

    BarryWashington New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Nov 15, 2010
    well, i'll let emanuel steward tell it himself:

    that's emanuel steward talking about mike mccallum.
    u gonna go against steward's word?
     
  9. MarxP

    MarxP New Member Full Member

    68
    0
    Mar 19, 2010
    Hearns wouldn't be able to use his reach as effectively since McCallum had freakishly long arms. They actually had the same reach IIRC.
     
  10. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Sometimes, yes.

    When it comes to Hearns, probably not. :lol:

    Great quote.
     
  11. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,510
    7
    Mar 25, 2010
    McCallum. Late ko. Flash told me George Benton said McCallum was best he's trained.
     
  12. BarryWashington

    BarryWashington New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Nov 15, 2010
    perhaps steward's man crush for mccallum is some
    what biased, but, i think i'll take it as a reference.
    mccallum had great skill, can work the body and
    had an iron chin. tommy was a beast (one of my
    faves), but, i have to go with mccallum.
     
  13. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    Why not? He's a trainer who used to watch the two spar together. He's no psychic, nor is he an especially skilled fight picker. In fact most of the time he has his head up his ass.
     
  14. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    391
    Jun 14, 2006
    :lol:
     
  15. BarryWashington

    BarryWashington New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Nov 15, 2010
    dude - unrelated, but, i gotta ask:

    who is that chick in your avatar? every time you
    post i get distracted lookin' at that donk