Those scorecards were absurd. Lucas won easily

Let me guess, you picked Prov in the build up ?

The fight wasn't remotely close, and don't make yourself look an even bigger cnut by trying to imply that one big shot outscores 20 unanswered jabs.

Surprise surprise Lederman scored the fight wrong, fcuk me that never happened before did it ?

GTFO and don't insult my intelligence, with your drivel.

 

I feel like a draw requires the absolute maximum amount of charity possible given to Provodnikov and any card in his favor is flat out awful.

 

Yeah I thought Matthysse won most of the rounds. Every so often Provodnikov would land a shot or two that moved Matthysse, but that **** doesn't win you the round if the other guy is damn near landing at will. Giving Provodnikov four rounds max is about right, possibly even generous a round.

 

I think I had Matthysse winning 8-4. Can't see how you could score it for Provo, unless you don't score jabs and even at that its a push.

 

Provodnikov fought a street fight.
Lucas fough a boxing fight.

Maybe ppl who scored a draw expect a street fight.

In boxing rules, Lucas outclassed Provodnikov.

 

I thought the scorecards were fine. I had Matthysse winning by one point.

 

It was simply a case of trying to give rounds to Provodnikov. Everybody saw him getting smashed early so you start being more generous to him in the middle rounds, almost searching to give it to him. The semi-close rounds end up being auto-provodnikov. Then he actually won the last 2 rounds and you end up with a pretty one sided fight being a draw.

 

matthysse won 9 rounds

 

I didn't have a pick in the lead-up.

I'm a fan of both, and figured it was over at the end of two. I was surprised at Provodnikov's resilience and heart. I scored it as I saw it.

The above statement shows who the stupid cnut is here. You're too thick to follow the logic of your daft statements.


In the extreme, against twenty unanswered jabs, one good shot that scores a KD, scores a round 10-8.

Without the KD, it can score it 10-9 in favour of the heavier hitter.

That has fukc all to do with the point you were trying to make.

i've disagreed with Lederman from time to time. He's not infallible

But You didn't say he got it wrong. you said he had no clue about boxing.

Same for the other judge, and same for the majority of those who scored it and screed it 6-6 or 7-5.

None of those have a clue, but some gormless gobshyte like yourself does ?

GTFO, You don't have any intelligence to insult.

 

I liked the scores 114-114 to 116-112 is the right range

 

7-5 mattysse. apparently 3 ringside judges and lederman dont know how to judge fights. most people scored it around there. if you had 8-4, its not egregious either.

 

You seem to be an even more stupid kunt than two shakes .

(and that takes some doing)

You score the bout 7-5, and when someone scores ONE FUKCING ROUND out of 12 differently, they don't know how to score a fight ?

 

You sensed anger in the post you quoted ?

Which part was that that seemed to point towards irritation ?


Or are you just the third member of the three mentally challenged amigos ?


Lessin' you've gotten any brighter than your earlier posts have indicated, you'd certainly fit the bill.