Those who had Pacman winning 11-1...

Absolutely. Bad decision, no robbery. If you think otherwise, well, watch more boxing.

 

I had pac up by 2 rounds and i wanted him to win... I agree there are some disgusting judges around

 

Actually I gave Bradley rounds 1,2,10,11,12....and rounds 8 & 9 were close as well...it's like this, Bradley outvoted Pac by sheer volume in those 5 rounds I gave him, as usual the HBO crew were as biased as they could be in favor of Package, the crowd would go nuts if Pac threw a 4 punch combo even tho No punch lands...

Tim would win the first 2 plus minutes of a round with a jab & body punching then Pac would land one clean punch or flurry at the end and the HBO crew namely Harold Letterman would give Pac the round, after I watch and dissected this fight after the third time I realized this, both Pac and Bradley looked mediocre, Manny seems now to be on the decline and this fight was far from a robbery, neither fighter dominated Tim lacked power and clean head shots, Manny had a poor work, looked frustrated & sloppy and could only land the straight left, questionable decision but i can see why the judges scored it for Tim...

 

Adamek-Chambers was a robbery

 

At most i can give to Tim is 4 rounds.

 

Not really. 11-1 is definitely a bit biased but based on what actually took place....it's a WHOLE LOT more reasonable than having Tim as the "WINNER" on a few ******ed score cards. My card was 9-3...and I felt like I was being extremely generous to Tim.

 

there are 5 guranteed Manny rounds IMO. 1 Bradley round.

to give the oter 6 to bradley is giving him every benefit of the doubt imaginable.

 

I had Chambers winning comfortably...but Adamek did more in his fight with Eddie than Tim was able to do in his fight with manny. Bad decision for Adamek.....a complete robbery for Tim.

 

Please list those rounds, I saw 2 definite Timmy rounds and 4 Pac rounds with the rest being very close.

 

At most Bradley won 3 rounds and 2 of those rounds could have gone to Pac so yes it was a robbery. Its dumb fans who let bad judges get away with it because they start to argure cases they have no right doing.

 

What's worse is those who gave Pacquiao more than 4 rounds against Marquez last year...

Bradley won at least 4 rounds against Pacquiao.

Seriously...Marquez boxed a damn near perfect fight and was told "It's only business." straight to his face...

but like either of those results matter or mean something...Top Rank Team Pacquiao have been creating set ups and fixing fights for a long time now...


It's all bull****...it's been bull****.


You'd think everyone who supposedly "knows Boxing" would have known that last bit after Pacquiao-Clottey was made and played out right in front of us....but no...most fans aren't educated or experienced anymore...

It seems like all there is now are mainstream fanatics/amateur haters/nationalists who think they're Quality Boxing Fans just because they watch fights and post excessively on Boxing forums...

It takes DECADES of experience to truly know this sport...so much research and attention to details...and there is only a small handful of us scattered across the entire Online Boxing Community.

 

Sorry, but when somebody could landon you 5 punches that have absolutely no effect, or your opponent laughs and smiles at you... Then you land 2 punches back with bad intentions that rock them, and they look like they want to quit. I'm gonna pick the guy that's eating the others soul.
On top of landing harder, there was only 1 round he didn't land more, or throw more. So land more, land harder, throw more, chase the guy around the ring. I gave Bradley 2 rounds, but 11-1 is definitely feasible.

 

:good

:deal