Those who had Pacman winning 11-1...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dmaq, Jun 18, 2012.


  1. spooky

    spooky Active Member Full Member

    1,039
    0
    Aug 19, 2007
    I had it 11-1 for pac.

    you could give Tim 2 rounds but thats puching it. Even when pac took rounds off he was still winning the rounds. I saw Tim throw a pitter patter combo on Mannys gloves and then Manny shotgun a left hand on Tims face. over and over agian. TB is a warrior and tried to make it to the end... Manny had him hurt many times and carried the fight.
     
  2. casian72

    casian72 Active Member Full Member

    1,106
    13
    Jun 29, 2010
    only unbaised opinions really matter cuz if your a ******* you will give every conceivalbe edge to Pac, so your neutrality is nonexistent. I had Pac winning 8-4 and I almost gave it to Pac by a larger margin because I watched it with HBO commentary till I realized how biased they were calling it. After rewatching it again I had the same score but could see why some could have scored a Pac win by 115-113 or 117-111. So greatest robbery ever? not even close. Greatest over reaction by delusion fans? This one definitely takes the cake.
     
  3. dmaq

    dmaq Member Full Member

    393
    1
    Apr 5, 2012
    thank you
     
  4. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
    The fight was much closer than what people are trying to make it out to be.
     
  5. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  6. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    It was a terrible decision. End of story. Definitely no robbery of the century.

    If you scored it a draw/Bradley win then you should not be scoring fights.

    I just don't understand the "116-112 Pacquiao won for sure" = "Well I can see a close Bradley win". What in the hell does that even mean? So Calzaghe bearts Kessler 116-112 = Kessler could win a close one?

    That logic doesn't work. Some rounds were close sure, but to give Bradley ANY more than 4 rounds is a joke. 5 is horrendous, 6 is shameful, and 7 is a god damn outrage. Watch the fight.

    I understand the reverse hate is easy because many *******s are indeed tards, but let's not always swim against the current.
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I don't see the point of getting worked up over any score in this bout.
    Boxing is at times a funny sport. Where a 8-4 fight can be more decisive than a 12-0 fight.