Thoughts on Bridgerweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jul 25, 2021.

  1. UmarIFLUmar

    UmarIFLUmar Member Full Member

    474
    702
    Jan 8, 2021
    Ruizweight
     
  2. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,720
    7,102
    Oct 12, 2010
    Butterbeanweight.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2021
    jaytxxl and UmarIFLUmar like this.
  3. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 The Original 101.3 Full Member

    8,007
    9,778
    Mar 17, 2018
    Sanctioning fees

    They have no shame which is why i thought they'd jump on this

    Speaks volumes they haven't
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  4. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,777
    1,648
    Jun 24, 2007
    Bridgerweight = dumb, stupid, not needed, sickening, money grab, pathetic, asinine
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    375,252
    56,947
    Nov 30, 2006
    I like the story of the kid saving his sister and don't even really mind that being the inspiration of the division's name ...and I've long thought a sort of "super cruiser" or "junior heavy" might be a welcome addition should it find a way to elbow into the sport...but this is going to have a hell of a hard time getting off the ground, due to a lot of factors. (the availability of solid inaugural talents who can either come down from HW or up from CW/LHW/SMW; the state of current world affairs with the pandemic and everything having slowed down the business side of boxing in general; backlash against the name; the perception that we already have too many classes and that problem being exacerbated by too many belts within each..)
     
    Rumsfeld and Surrix like this.
  6. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,339
    2,898
    Oct 5, 2009
    i havent watched the vid yet and havent followed the division since my initial reaction. have they even scheduled fights for this thing yet
     
  7. destruction

    destruction Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,214
    9,009
    Mar 26, 2009
    The WBA must be satisfied with having 25 different ‘world champions’ at every weight class.
     
    Wizbit1013 and Rumsfeld like this.
  8. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,753
    2,076
    Sep 16, 2020
    I think 200-225 lbs weight class might be good if they will keep cruiser limit 175-200 lbs because otherwise CW division might be done completely if limit will be 190 lbs.

    Problem with multiple belts never will be solved: promoters, both: events promoters and boxers promoters loves belts. Managers and agents loves belts, boxing orgs are happy to have huge bunch with belts.
    National, regional and continental titles is very easy to understand and they does have legit reason and ground. Like British, Commonwealth, Euro Union, Euro, Asian etc.

    These: global, international, intercontinental, internim, transcontinental, franchise, in recess etc looks that are stuff very difficult to understand.
     
  9. rapscalion

    rapscalion Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,715
    598
    Oct 7, 2010
    I wish I had two more hands, so I could give this weight class 4 thumbs down.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  10. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    47,219
    7,918
    Jul 19, 2004
    I was originally going to mention that origin name story, and how (IMO) they exploited a feel-good story to sneak in more BS, but I wound up deciding against it.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  11. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,775
    10,306
    Jul 4, 2014
    No, I got that. The point is that if they want more sanctioning fees, the can just invent another heavyweight champion or two.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    375,252
    56,947
    Nov 30, 2006
    It's true, it could have been as nefarious as that - or, it could have been a well-intentioned but clunky attempt to pay the kid tribute. (when maybe the situation would've called more for concocting a special commemorative belt for him or something), guess I was just willing to give benefit of he doubt. I know either way the use of his name was soundly criticized by fans who just thought it was a stupid name for a weight class, even leaving aside issues of sensationalistic opportunism.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  13. boxingforum24

    boxingforum24 Active Member Full Member

    681
    1,129
    Jul 10, 2013
    The old adage 'less is more' springs to mind when discussing weight divisions in boxing.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  14. sasto

    sasto Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,967
    5,451
    Aug 5, 2020
    I think they could have done what's already been done and moved the CW limit to ~210. Maybe accompany this with moving LHW up to 180 (although this would mess with Canelo so it won't happen).

    But it all seems unnecessary. Wilder was a bathroom trip and a haircut away from 210 for some of his title fights against super HWs. It's a pretty select group of giants who can't get below 200.

    The only value I see (as a fan) is for it to be a "junior" division where young HWs can develop without so much pressure to bulk up. Perhaps it makes the next generation of HWs fitter and we can have fewer 3 round fights followed by 9 round slow dances. It won't play out like this, but this is the most optimistic fantasy I can muster.
     
    IntentionalButt likes this.
  15. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    87,237
    20,540
    Jan 18, 2010
    Good vid again Rums
    I never heard that fact about Froch KO'ing Groves in Wembley stadium, though. That was totally new for me, as I believe that's totally new for everyone else here as well :lol: