Thoughts on Jones Jr as an example of the definition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Tin_Ribs, Jun 9, 2010.


  1. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    When it mattered, Jones beat the other Great fighters such as Toney and Hopkins.

    No doubt, one of the Greats.
     
  2. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Nah, I think his performances show he had ATG skills, its his accomplishments that bring him down.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    A hell of a lot, because he would have beaten both Hopkins and DM, and anyone else he fought, IMO.
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Well, that´s actually what I said. :good
     
  5. horst

    horst Guest

    Pity it didn't matter more often then. Two fights does not an ATG make.
     
  6. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    The world is all that is the case. Other than this we be silent.

    We need to get the fly out of the bottle boys.
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    I wouldn´t call the Hopkins Jones fought an atg.
     
  8. horst

    horst Guest

    Neither would I.
     
  9. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
  10. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,457
    4,096
    Jun 28, 2009
    I've left it a bit late to chip in, but I only mentioned Jones as an EXAMPLE. Maybe I worded the opening post incorrectly, because I was more interested in what different people quantify as greatness and whether or not the general term is used too often. Such as if not ranking inside the top 50 affects the right to be classified as a truly great fighter.

    In other words, if such harsh standards became the norm, what does it do to the likes of Tszyu, De La Hoya, Mayweather Jr, McCallum, Barrera and all the other 'great' fighters who I wouldn't put in the top 40-50 of all time if I actually ever took the time to compile a list?
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    I've said before that I think the terms should be used more selectively. I'm not happy calling the likes of Mosley or DLH "ATGs" - I'm not even sure I'd call them "Greats". I think the ATGs are probably the top 50 or 60 of all time, the Greats the top 80-90 or so.
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    How much W have you read?
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I agree 100%. :deal
     
  14. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    I think it's pretty useless to put any set number on this kind of thing, which is why I don't usually flirt with lists unless I'm simply doing it for fun. There were so many great fighters throughout history, with so many different circumstances surrounding the unfoldings of their careers, that I think it's a pretty futile effort when looking to rank them. I just appreciate the fighters and the history.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    I thought I was the only way that thought this way. Historical lists are pretty popular around here, but useless, because noone could have all the information that you listed above. You almost have to live it to know it. I agree with your post 100% and why I hate lists.