OK - some thoughts on last nights fight. Very exciting, dramatic action. Viewers got their money’s worth and the Joshua superfight is even hotter - assuming he takes care of Parker! Wilder may be one of the most enigmatic and fascinating heavyweight champions ever. It’s impossible to draw any sort of rational conclusion on him. 40-0, 39 KO’s. Defeated a legit contender. Did it by sensational KO. All great. His fan club go wild, feel vindicated. And they certainly have reason to feel that way. However...once again, in victory his haters have more fuel to keep them going. He took the judges out of the fight and kudos to him for that - and his power is REAL, no doubt. However, before we get too high on that, we should remember that his power bailed him out of a fight that he was comprehensively losingnin (despite what the official scorecards said...). He was losing and being beaten to the jab, being dictated to as far as real estate goes, and for the most part having his assets taken from him. The power is a get out of jail free card. And yeah, it’s all academic when you can punch like that. The other guy can have you beaten in every other department, but if you can just bang him out, nothing else matters. Which is what makes him so fascinating. Has anyone in history ever been able to do what he does? Erase a litany of problems in any given fight based almost solely on one god given gift? I honestly wouldn’t confidently bet on anyone in history to beat the guy cos of that one huge asset. Which is outrageous and amazing all at once. This is maybe why he has as many detractors as supporters. The haters don’t feel he deserves it, that he’s lucky - whereas the supporters see the results and love it. What’s not to love? We all tune in and it’s entertainment from the first bell to the last. Each side has a real solid argument against the other. But wow, what a truly bizarre and possibly unprecedented situation. On paper Joshua, Fury et al should be able to take him - he’s wild, reckless (did anyone see the slo mo replay of him rushing Ortiz, hands down and Ortiz coming within a whisker of his chin?!) and all over the place at times, but only a fool would bet against him doing “that thing you do”. And at that point all flaws are forgiven and all issues forgotten. I should mention, a lot of pundits are drawing comparisons with Joshua’s performance against Klitschko - I feel this is erroneous given that Joshua was winning the majority of rounds and out fighting Klitschko for the bulk of their ring time. He was much more in control of things than Wilder was last night. He didn’t exactly bail himself out on that one. No offence to Widlers gutsy performance last night, I just think the similarities are a bit more superficial. I love it!
I think it's unfair, and perhaps flat out wrong, to say his power just "bailed him out" of a losing fight, as if it's just a lucky trait he was born with. Wilder chooses to give up rounds to focus on the KO. That's his strategy. He chooses to put everything on getting one big hit. And why shouldn't he? He has 12 rounds to do it, and all it takes is one wobble with 30+ sec on the clock, and you're almost certainly done. Look at how frenzied he gets whenever his opponent gets wobbled. He will literally sprint at them. That's not random. He knows those moments are his big chance. He's trained and prepared specifically for those moments. Wilder could choose the conventional style. He's capable of it. That's how he fought Stiverne in the first fight after breaking his hand. But he's consciously chosen not to do that. Wilder has chosen not be a boxer.
his weaknesses are what make him unique and fun to watch......but they will ultimately be his downfall in the end.
It’s hard to see him stay unbeaten but I don’t think too many in the division can topple him. I like him. He’s a good boy.
Wilder by name Wilder by nature. He's getting the job done and that's all that counts. I've never seen power so hard and consistent throughout a fight. He's stopped every opponent he's ever faced, "He don't play in this game Baby!"
With so many titles, we now see fighters who aren't really matched tough until they're defending a belt.
Nope. Mayweather was watched because of his defence. Tyson was watched because of his attack. etc etc etc Wilder is watched because he's very vulnerable in every fight.
Thing is, he didn't do that with Stiverne part 2 did he. Or even part 1. Maybe it depends on how good his opponent is.
Wilder definitely is one of the most exciting fighters to watch in boxing because of his vulnerabilities combined with his ability to always fight back and find a way to win. He did it vs Molina, Szpilka and Washington and hopefully now that he's done it vs a legit opponent US fans will start taking him seriously. Much like how many Brit fans didn't take Fury seriously until he beat Wlad as Fury was seen by many as the fat, chinny, joker of a heavyweight who punched himself in the face. After he beat Wlad people had to take him more seriously and despite all his troubles since he's still seen as one of the top guys if he can get fit again. I hope Wilder can get some more media exposure to build this fight with Joshua. Joshua/Wilder deserves to be on the biggest platform in boxing, lets hope US sports fans take notice.
In part 1 he broke his hand. In part 2, are you saying that because he jabbed a lot? I mean, jabs are still great for range finding, controlling the distance, and setting up your right in general.
No Im just saying he never did what you said that he does in that he just waits and then boom! I don't think he did that with Stiverne. Thats why I said maybe it depends if he knows he cant outbox an individual, he then chooses to wait for an opening. This theory about Wilder is new as I have not heard this before.