just watched it last night. i have to say i have lost alot of respect for ali and gained a mountain of it for joe. It has left me wondering how ali gained his status. anyone else seen this and wat did they think?
Everyone became caught up in the Ali circus and didn't give too much thought to the hurt he caused. Especially to Joe. Ali gained his status firstly with his mouth. Then he backed it up in the ring Really felt for Joe by the end of the doco. He didn't deserve that **** :-(
It made me believe Ali shouldn't have done that, especially considering what Joe did for him, but considering the stage they were on and Ali's persona and the magnitude of their competition, I can't help but think Joe should have known better than to live with such bitterness for so many years over it.
Very biased and agenda-ridden documentary. You can tell Joe's side of the story without having to trashed Ali. It seems to me the only they could get Fraziers story across was through casting Ali a certain way, which is pretty sad. I thought it was pathetic and just part of this whole pop culture backlash on Ali from people who don't understand the times and sport these guys were in. It's important to point out that the person who made this is the son of the writer Mark Kram (spelt the same backwards), who wrote the equally very agenda ridden book 'Ghosts of Manila", which it's based on. It was very disingeneous to me. Everytime Ali spoke there was sinister music played. There was no context to what was going on, no mention of the political tensions and Frazier befriending of ruthless police chiefs in Philly. It was permeated with double standards throughout. Basically just an attack on Ali that wasn't even thinly disguised.
i see exactly what u mean and the bias nature did cross my mind. But it doesnt change what ali did after all fraiser had done for ali. How else can you portray joes side of the storey without showing what ali was doing to him. If thats the way u felt watching that doco imagine how joe felt dealing with all ali's trash talk that the whole world just lapped up. especially with the political climate u mentioned and the fact that joe had more to do with the working class african americans then ali did and that was forgotten and ignored. ali had a habit of emotionally destroying fighters in a very disturbing way where he totally disregarded their well being as well as their families. liston and foreman are further proof of this.
How many docos have you seen where Ali's treatment of Frazier and it's implications over a long period of time was totally ignored? I've seen a few
Not very nice of Ali.... However, you could also say that; disgusting as it was; trash talking was also part of the game: getting into your adversary's mind, pissing him off and making him lose focus is nothing new in the boxing business... professional fighters are supposed to be able to deal with it. Sure Ali took trash talking to a new upper level, and sure he crossed a lot of boundaries and broke a lot of ethic codes; however, I also think that Joe played the victimization card too much and too long
good point. i just think there are boundaries u should never cross and he crossed all of them sometimes in a disgusting manner. Also the fact that joe did alot for him makes it worse.
Ali was a crazy man, and his antics to promote a fight crossed the line. What fascinated me was the story where Ali was ready to quit in round 14, but Frazier quit first. Not sure it its true or not, but Ali did collapse in the ring afterwards.
It was a good documentary,but very biased on behalf of Joe Frazier. It almost seems the trend nowadays to highlight Ali's negative points. I'm an Ali fan,through and through,but not a FANBOY or nuthugger. There's a subtle difference. While I would admit that a lot of casual fans have been sycophantic towards Muhammad in recent times,the other side of the same extremist coin is evident by those lapping up the bias of documentaries like the one under discussion here. I also had great admiration for Joe Frazier,but like Muhammad,HE was n't the angel that is sometimes portrayed either.
This article pushed things to far the other way. It's a retrospective redressing of a balance which has been weighed much to much in Ali's favour for so many years, so naturally it's a little heavy handed. Overall, it was a positive thing, but there have been a huge amount of threads like this one since this doc came out (it was out in the UK about a year before it was broadcast in the US).