thurman or porter

Porter gets his ass knocked out.

 

Definitely DKSAB, ask Porter himself atsch

Porter gets credit for the last win, he is #3 now behind Thurman & Mayweather in WW

 

Can't really go wrong either way. Both have an unconventional leaping offense. Porter seems to have a little better defense, Thurman seems to have better jabs

It's a great fight

 

Uhh.... Pacquiao was never a beast at 147. He made a severely shot and dehydrated Oscar quit, viciously ko'd Hatton... and thats about it. Cotto and Marg were at catchweights.

 

1 Time baaaaaby! Awwwww yeah. Last nights version of Paulie
would've been killed by Thurman.

 

I'm pretty sure that's incorrect for Thurman. 1 time is more like 5'9"
or 5'10"

 

No No, The leaping left is a signature move of Porters. Thurman did it against Karass but he was trying to get to him before the ref got there to stop the fight. Porter is a swarmer with decent power and Thurman is a boxer puncher with excellent power.

 

Thurman wins this easy.

Thurman counter punches better than Pauli and will catch Porter leaping in.

Porter punches so widely, I see Thurman landing clean shots in between Porter's wild and wide hooks.

 

Idk. They must fight. Winner has to fight Floyd. Tis the only way.

 

Thurman needs to work on some things, but he does have the one punch power. I like his win over Chaves better than Porter's wins over Alexander and Malignaggi. Beating Paulie up don't mean ****. I don't think Porter would beat Chaves.

 

How'd this Charlo talk start? I don't think either Porter or thurman is planning a move up any time. soon.

 

The only way fans can find out is for Thurman and Porter to fight..............

 

This fight will be big this fight will happen in like 2016

it will be a big paper view fight

 

I wasn't disagreeing with you mate :good

My point was and still is that Kell shouldn't be overlooked at based on his competition to date when the likes of Keith Thurman who have a very similar resume to date are getting smoked blown up their arses.

And you're right about Thurman's performance against Chavez, but why does that still discredit Kell getting a win when he was hit by a challenge?

 

I guess you could say that in Thurman's gut check win he showed more strength then weakness and in Kell`s gut check win he showed more weakness then strength. That is just the general sentiment. My personal opinion isn`t quite as negative as that. I don`t read much one way or another into Kell`s performance. Less then a year before he was a world champion Porter was getting a schooling by Diaz. These type of fights happen to young fighters.

One thing I will say is that Chavez is probably a way way better fighter then anyone Brook has ever faced.