Tiger vs Calzeghe

Calzaghe, this isn't even competitive.

 

That's the way you percieve it. I pick Roy Jones over him and several at LHW. Just not someone like Tiger.

He's really a great fighter, most people just don't understand this to the fullest, he's way out of Tiger's league mate. Would you pick Tiger over Roy Jones Jr?

H2H, Calzaghe is up there with Roy, I'm serious and I am not being biased.

 

It's not really much more complicated than what I said. Nearly everyone is at a stylistic disadvantage against Calzaghe, except for guys like Roy Jones and then very long heavy hitters like Bob Foster at LHW.

So here is your graph -

At 168 -

Calzaghe > Everyone who is not Roy Jones Jr.

At 175 -

Calzaghe > Everyone who is not Roy Jones Jr, Michael Moorer, Bob Foster and Michael Spinks

Calzaghe who brutalise Tiger so badly that it would be hard to watch.

 

Calzaghe might beat Tiger, but brutalize him? Not a ****ing chance. Tiger was far too strong, far too tough, far too hard punching; Calzaghe wouldn't be able to afford to set his feet and find the punching angles to mount a damaging assault on Tiger. He'd probably try it early on but he'd soon realize he can't crack this cookie, who was very quick in his own right (any argument that Calzaghe could dart in-and-out with hard combinations can be thrown out the window - Tiger would catch him).

Lacy-Tiger is a terrible comparison. Lacey was a fool who didn't have the experience nor speed to compete with Calzaghe. Tiger was tighter, smarter and much quicker.

 

I am seriouzzzz, coollzzzz.:nut :nut :nut

Name them then.:good

 

Bivins?:rofl

Just because of that, I won't comment on the rest.

 

C´mon Amsterdam, you little kiddy, you don´t even know Jimmy Bivins, so don´t laugh so stupid. I hate such unbelievable nut huggers...