Tiger vs LaMotta

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by robert ungurean, Aug 23, 2015.



  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    7,266
    2,800
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 19, 2012
    LaMotta wasn't the same fighter he had been when he should have gotten a title shot. 1945-48. Tiger could very well beat him but Robinson knew Jake's situation. I don't see a stoppage.
     
  2. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    7,266
    2,800
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 19, 2012
    With all due respect Fullmer was no LaMotta. He was closer to Vinny Pazienza with good manners.
     
  3. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,039
    1,810
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 10, 2013
    I think LaMotta was better than Fullmer in a lot of areas but I dont know that it would matter. You didnt want to go straight at **** Tiger.
     
    KuRuPT and Rainer like this.
  4. Rainer

    Rainer Active Member Full Member

    707
    420
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 2, 2019
    He was a very strong middle weight, which was my point. I'm no fan of his myself.
     
  5. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Full Member

    10,278
    4,422
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 9, 2007
    I think Fullmer would have literally destroyed Pazienza but different topic altogether.
     
    Rainer likes this.

Share This Page