Tim Bradley: Errol Spence Is Ducking Terence Crawford (!)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pakkuman, Aug 11, 2019.



  1. bandeedo

    bandeedo quaecumque vera Full Member

    21,529
    7,215
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 19, 2007
    not saying bud didnt want it, but arum confirming anything means jack. reread MY post again.
     
  2. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    4,929
    40
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 7, 2005
    I

    Spence : you fought a guy with one leg.
    Crawford: I'm going to give you stanky leg ? Wtf does that even mean and how is that a proper response to Spence comment. He was definitely being trolled by Crawford as Crawford was avoiding anything that has to do with facts.

    and how does Crawford have xray vision to see body fat under Spence hooded sweatshirt? How many times did Spence look Crawford in his eyes to tell him to tell his friend to stop. Crawford kept telling Spence to say it to him. Spence did numerous time s and when Crawford was satisfied he did nothing anyway ?

    I feel bad that Spence had to deal with Crawford's stupid .

    then Crawford acted like Arums advice to stay away from Crawford was words from God and new found Commandment. Of course Arum would say this. It may have a deeper meaning too. Like : 'please leave Crawford alone and don't try to derail his hypetrain'
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2019 at 12:11 PM
    pacas likes this.
  3. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,403
    2,799
    Sportsbook:
    1,308
    May 2, 2015
    You’re not saying that Bud didn’t want it, yet you’re arguing against me saying that he wanted it. Think you’re the one who needs to do the rereading.
     
  4. Ironmanmt

    Ironmanmt Member Full Member

    260
    374
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Apr 23, 2019
    Honestly, you sound stupid and incapable of an intelligent boxing conversation. Let me guess, you are probably 15 and started following boxing after playing video games. Do you know what the term biased means? If not look it up and as you are doing your research you will also find that Bradley and Crawford are good friends, anyone with a shred of intelligence can piece it together. Do your homework kid.
     
  5. sdot_thadon

    sdot_thadon Member Full Member

    184
    77
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 6, 2009
    He was just trash talking his comp. That's a slang version of saying he was gonna put him on ***** street or rock him with a punch.
     
  6. The Ogdoad

    The Ogdoad Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,897
    1,023
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Feb 27, 2017
    Bradley likes to hear himself talk. Spence and Crawford are two guys that would have beaten Bradley down.
     
    Ironmanmt and Pimp C like this.
  7. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    8,260
    266
    Sportsbook:
    1,429
    Jun 28, 2006
    Lets not forget Bradley ducked Spence. Spence was Bradley mandatory, but he all of a sudden retired lol
     
    Pimp C and Ironmanmt like this.
  8. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,942
    888
    Sportsbook:
    5,707
    Jan 4, 2005
    Err arum himself after Pac left him said “he killed the fight because he knew Pac would get hurt”, lol do you really buy that? That’s code for “I didn’t want to risk Crawford my next cash cow to a still dangerous Pac unless I know Pac is completely shot”.

    He coulda just said Pac was scared and didn’t want it in which case it won’t hold much water since it’s salty promoter but the fact he couldn’t even claim that and instead admitting to killing the fight himself.

    Pac wouldn’t duck anyone, pretty sure if he was offered the right money for TC, more than Horn he would take it up.

    Seems his primary motivation these days is the money’s.
     
  9. Wasteman

    Wasteman Certified Wasteman (Confirmed) Full Member

    456
    325
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 17, 2018
    Who would care to pause for a minute and join me in reviewing yet another example that Errol is a hypocrite who don't want no smoke.

    So, we have Errol on video and in this particular video he's taking Crawford to task, asking who it is that Crawford's fought which has made him worthy of a shot against himself? Then Errol goes on to say that he's fought Lamont Peterson and in such a way which strongly suggests he believes this win in particular trumps all of Crawford's competition.

    Yet what Errol fails to realize is that Lamont's best wins came against Amir Khan and Felix Diaz, two opponents that Crawford has already beaten.

    Why then is Errol calling Crawford's résumé ****? I'm afraid that the answer is self evident: he don't want none of that Crawford smoke and not only this but it also appears that he dksab too (at least on occasions which suit him anyway.)

    Sad thing is I actually rate Errol's chances against Crawford. I don't dislike the guy, far from it but I Ioathe hypocrisy and a guy with Errol's talents should be above that ****.

    Come now lads, stop taking cheap shots and get the match made already, for the fans!
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2019 at 10:13 AM