Tim Bradley is a more Versatile fighter than Chad Dawson who is One Dimensional.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HENDO, Apr 7, 2010.


  1. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    It's all good man. But i think Hopkins beat up Tarver alot worse. Hopkins even busted Tarver up while Tarver didn't have a scratch when he lost to Dawson in the first fight. I'll give Tarver credit rather we like him or not, Tarver is one tough fighter.
     
  2. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    You're the ignorant mother ****er I'm talkin about.

    What the **** you know about boxing. Why don't you give me an example of some pressure fighters that you think are good.

    By the way, apparently pressure fighters are the only mother ****ers that can be one dimensional, when IN THIS THREAD alone, I've proved otherwise.

    But Ricky Hatton, who obviously IS a one dimensional fighter came out of your mouth as if to determine who the status quo of one dimensional fighter's represented.

    Think about it like this, since you apparently don't know what the **** you're talkin about.

    Chambers, a guy who for some reason people say was a great slick boxer, (who by the way I've never agreed with), showed that he is a completely one dimensional fighter when he was faced against a guy who was a better boxer than he was.

    Dawson was in with Tarver a guy who he could beat by outboxing, mainly due to the fact that Dawson was a young kid, and Tarver was damn near a 40 year old man, and he did that, winning on activity in a fight where most of the guys punches landed on gloves, and no one was ever in danger of being knocked out in some incredibly boring fights.

    If Dawson had another dimension, he would have took advantage of Tarver's unwillingness to press the fight, and pressed the fight for him, looked spectacular, landed the majority of his punches, and put a severe beating on Tarver, similiar to what Hopkins did when Hopkins almost knocked him out in the 11th and 12th rounds.

    He didn't. He dropped the ****in ball. If he has another dimension in his game, he should have used it. He didn't.

    So what the **** are you talkin to me about like you think you know boxin, cuz you don't know ****.
     
  3. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    I was making an example of showing how dumb you are cause if you think Dawson is 1 dimensional then you might think Hatton is an complete fighter.


    I know Hatton is 1 dimensional that likes to hug alot.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    Let me get this straight Dawson is one-dimensional because he didn't stop Tarver?:patsch Do you know how stupid this sounds? How many guys have stopped Tarver? Did you ever stop to think of that?:-(
     
  5. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Well you obviously failed, because you're under the impression that only pressure fighters can be one dimensional which is false.

    And that I don't know what the **** I'm talkin about which is false again.

    You may not agree with what I have to say, but I know what I see, and see what I know.

    And you must be tryin to mistake me for someone else. I don't dick ride mother ****ers. I see everything as it is.
     
  6. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Yea you're right i don't know **** in which means Dawson is 1 dimensional. :rofl Hell Mayweather is also 1 dimensional. A prime Whitaker is 1 dimensional. Chris Bryd is 1 dimensional. Steve Cunningham is 1 dimensional. A prime Winky Wright is 1 dimensional. :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  7. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I didn't say that.

    I said, he didn't even TRY. Boxing is not just about winning. It's about performing.

    Ask Klitschko how many fans he has in America. Lighter weight guys can get away with bullshittin, but when you a super tallented guy goin half ass and not takin any risks, yet demanding the whole world, he's gotta put up or shut up.

    Isn't it said that a 25 year old kid couldn't duplicate what 40+ year old non puncher did years ago? Let's be reasonable here.

    If Dawson wanted Hopkins, he shoulda made a statement. He two opportunities. It's bad enough that there was a rematch in the first place.

    Hopkins left no doubts. He beat the **** outta Tarver. Ain't nobody in the world would wanna see a rematch.

    Rematches are for fighters to make statements. Dawson had his opportunity and he dropped the ball.

    If he didn't, we would be talkin about Hopkins vs Dawson right now, cuz it would be too big to ignore.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    I guess pac is 1 dimensional as well since he threw 1200 punches and couldn't get Clottey out of there as well? By his definition if you don't stop someone you're 1 dimensional.:lol::rofl:lol:
     
  9. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    I guess you don't remember the outrage of Dawson-Tarver 2? Dawson beat the **** outta Tarver in the first fight and it didn't warrant a rematch that's why everyone here was so upset about the rematch.
     
  11. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Well thank god Devon tko Urango cause if it went to decision, hendo would say Devon is 1 dimensional lol.
     
  12. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    It's obvious you don't know Winky Wright. You must be new to the sport. You didn't see Winky against Taylor did you.

    And you can post all those ridiculous smiley faces, but just because you're one dimensional doesn't mean you can't be a great fighter.

    There are many fighters in history that have been one dimensional and have been champions.

    Chris Byrd had no chance on the outside, and at least tried to press the fight against Klitschko the second time around. Really, Chris had no business fightin Klitschko in the first place, yet he knew that he had no chance at all on the outside and took a risk.

    Has Mayweather ever been in with a superior boxer? The answer is an obvious no. There is a reason why Mayweather created this persona that people know of him. He wouldn't be nearly as popular as he is right now, regardless of how good he is, without being who he is on camera. His bad boy image sells.

    But how would Mayweather fair against Tommy Hearns? He certainly can't outbox him. That's suicide. The only way to get to Tommy is to touch that chin, and you better get inside those long arms cuz Tommy is fast enough, precise enough, and smart enough to keep you on the outside of his stick.

    See, you need to uncloud your mind. You like to talk ****, but you don't the knowledge to dispense to dispute me. Learn the sport and then get back to me.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    You know it.:lol::rofl:lol:
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,061
    35,182
    Jun 23, 2005
    Capfunds man you're a piece of work.:D:good
     
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    I have a tendency to agree with this to some extent. But he's damn great at what he does.