Tim Bradley is not world class

He has only lost to a the p4p number one or two how does that, mean that he isn't World class?

 

he is more world class than ortiz or khan is record says so:yep

 

No. He lost seven rounds and should have taken an L, because Pac was busier. Most of the "bombs" he seemed to be getting hit with among those flurries, he wasn't. It was close - should have been close-but-clear for Pac, but it was definitely close.

No, lots of *******s and casual fans who DKSAB think this.

Of course.

Doubtful. I've always favored Bradley in that match-up at 140, and 147 would be no different.

Absolutely not. Bradley would be about twice as effective as Peterson was against Ortiz in a close fight...so...

Agreed, except the part about Khan beating him.

I think your threads are too shitty. Everyone's a critic. :conf

Yeah because he's just so slow and bulky. :roll: That's why he was dodging the overwhelming majority of Pacquiao's punches.

 

That'll do it.

 

:deal This.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

28 have tried....28 have failed. there is no blueprint.

timmeh is the man!!!

 

Shitty thread

 

Since apparently you missed it, I scored it 115-113 Pacquiao.

That doesn't mean he "dominated".

 

So Pac looked average with a feather fisted fighter,with 2 bad feet? Well if this is the case then Pac is def on the slide. Most of thought Bradley would get the KO,this is just an attempt to not give Bradley credit... Your on the internet telling an undefeated he isn't world class lol...

 

agreed yo

 

Did you find your dog?

 

i remember the Pacquiao fans saying "bradley is a young undefeated lion" before the fight. now all of a sudden

"he isnt world class"

so if bradley isnt world class, doesnt that say that pacquiao choosing him as his opponent mean, in your own terms, that pacquiao was "cherry picking?"