Well Pacquiao already beat him, so I'm saying no. I wouldn't open my curtains if Bradley was fighting in my garden.
:rofl last time i checked Bradley was undefeated. Deal with it baby! Arum gonna use Pac when hes good and ready to retire to build Bradleys name. We all know pac cant beat Bradley let alone his daddy Marquez :yep
Usually, Bradley's only attendence is his family, but for this fight, they might not even go to the fight
Yes. But anyone with a brain knows who really won the fight (I'm not including you in this category). Marquez's two wins over Pacquiao at 147, including a highlight reel knock out, are better than Bradley's gift against Manny (which was actually a loss by 2-3 rounds). Head to head Marquez beats Bradley at 140 or 147. You can go back to trolling now. Cheerio.
Pacman - Bradley was a close fight and the close rounds could have been given to Bradley too making 116-114 fair according to the system. Pac won rounds more clearly but Bradley might have won more. It's more a fault of the scoring system really, it would have been fairer if Bradley got 9.5 points for some round he won and Manny 10 points because the Manny rounds he won were generally more convinsing. But it was scored according to the 10 point must system and with that scoring system Bradley might have won. 117-113 for Pac, or 114-116 for Bradley and scores in between are all good depending who you gave the close rounds to. And not giving a fighter a round because he didn't clearly win the previous round enough would be very lame and also corrupt. If you look at the whole fight Manny won, if you scored the fight round by round (According to the 10 point must system) they both could have won depending who you gave the close rounds to.
The pee pee man has been jacking off to poochiao since their 2nd fight. He's been studying that puzzle and finally was able to crack it (get it). But he's been avoiding all the other fighters. He does NOT beat bradley and many other fighters that he chose to duck