Tim Witherspoon vs Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by brownpimp88, Jan 8, 2008.


  1. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    I say witherspoon outboxes him to a comfortable ud over 12 rounds.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    Verry unlikley.

    Dempsey is rightly regarded as a top 10 all time heavyweight. He would be expected to find a way to beat Witherspoon.
     
  3. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,135
    17,706
    Apr 26, 2006
    Whitherspoon on points....
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    Witherspoon wouldnt last long enough for points to be a factor.

    He is not elusive enough to stay away from Dempsey so I dont see him lasting the distance.
     
  5. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,135
    17,706
    Apr 26, 2006
    Whitherspoon in his heyday had a great chin...he wasn,t knocked off his feet before the second Smith fight...before that he could last the distance with any heavyweight champion i think....:bbb
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,109
    25,265
    Jan 3, 2007
    I would pick Tim Witherspoon to take this by late TKO.

    Witherspoon's fights with Holmes, Tubbs, Bruno, Page, Snipes and several others were indications that he could compete with and even beat a lot of modern athletes who actually had a fair amount of boxing talent. He was well accustomed to fighting men who were of modern size, and himself stood 6'3" 215 Lbs on average. Spoon fought a very difficult style for most men to figure out and really did not have a genuine decisive defeat until probably Larry Donald in the late 90's. The decision losses to Holmes, Thomas, Martin and Mercer were all very close and somewhat controversial, while the Smith defeat was clearly a dive. Witherspoon had tremendous defensive skills and was not easy to hit, plus had a solid chin to compliment it. He could work the body, jab to the head, and had an overhand right that was lethal. Against a 188 lb Dempsey, Tim could be a real problem. Sure Dempsey was an all time great while Tim wasn't, but the only person standing in the way of Witherspoon being an all time great during his time was a man who I considered better than Dempsey, and some felt he was robbed of a decision. Thats to say nothing about the corrupt poilitics of the 1980's which kept Witherspoon from reaching his best.
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    You think he went in the tank in the Smith rematch?

    I thought he just went in the fight not in the best shape (mentally and physically) and got caught. Was it this fight where he was supposed to take a million and got like $90k?
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,109
    25,265
    Jan 3, 2007
    No, the Bruno fight was where he got screwed on his purse, then took King to court later. I started a whole thread on why he took a dive shortly before Christmas. If you scroll back a few weeks, you might find it, and see my explanation along with some of the responses it got.
     
  9. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Witherspoon's style is IMO similar to Ken Norton. He comes forward, but I think if he is pushed back, he doesn't do so good. Dempsey is all wrong for Witherspoon. This fight ends brutal for Spoon.

    Jack Dempsey KO 8 Tim Witherspoon:good
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    People picking Witherspoon lack a realistic perspective on who and what Jack Dempsey was.

    Dempsey was one of the three most destructive heavyweight punchers of all time along with Louis and Tyson. No fourth man can hold a candle to this trio with Sonny Liston perhaps coming the closest.

    Witherspoon was a talented and under rated heavyweight but he was never in Jack Dempsey's class or even close to being.
     
  11. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    I think 'Spoon has a good shot at winning a decision here, he has the talent and stylisically will pose Dempsey a stern test. That fine jab of his will also be a mean tool.

    I'm not certifing that view with total, cast iron confidence, though (if it was the likes of Lewis or Liston for example I would make them definite favourite to ice Dempsey). This is a tough fight to call, though.
     
  12. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    A very good analysis. It's not that Witherspoon isn't a very dangerous boxer or is totally out of his depth against Dempsey; it's that Dempsey perfected exactly the kind of style to match up with someone like Witherspoon.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,228
    Feb 15, 2006
    I find it a verry easy fight to call.

    There are only a small number of types of fighter who would have the tools to beat a prime Dempsey and Witherspoon dose not resemble any of them.

    How can Witherspoon win even theoreticaly?
     
  14. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    by outboxing him and stiffing his jab in dempseys face the enitre fight.
     
  15. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    Let's imagine that Tim Witherspoon comes to fight in-shape and motivated, and not sporting a pair of titties.

    Those rare instances Witherspoon was pretty good, as he showed against Larry Holmes. I'd give him a good chance against almost any man. Beating Denmpsey is a lot to ask of him though, and I'd expect Dempsey to win.