Tim Witherspoon vs Wladimir Klitschko

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Dec 11, 2010.


  1. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    Agree :thumbsup
     
  2. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,211
    8,743
    Jul 17, 2009
    :good Witherspoon's set of skills are on a totally different planet to Wladimir.
     
  3. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,672
    2,164
    Aug 26, 2004
    and the question would be how many top heavyweights did Witherspoon do this to....Bruno was ko'd before and after so was Gonzales and Ekland was flat KO'd by a few

    How many top heavy's of the 80's did Witherspoon KO
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,963
    46,804
    Feb 11, 2005
    I unfortunately have paid to watch Witherspoon "perform" in the ring. People here need a reality check. He had some tools but was an inconsistent and ultimately underwhelming fighter. Such is the level of delusion here that scrubs from one of the weakest eras of the division now dispatch one of the very best heavies of the past 40 year with ease. Obviously, it offers little guidance that similar estimations have been made of so many reigning champions over the past hundred + years.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,672
    2,164
    Aug 26, 2004
    Seamus, I have to agree with you on this one, I think this was a weak an unmotivated era and Witherspoon could be the poster boy....I think one of the reasons Holmes did so well is that he was always in shape (an odd thing for this era) and was carefully managed and navigated. The fact that Michael Spinks could win a title in his 1st fight as a heavyweight and being the 1st light-heavyweight Champion to do so, should say something about the 80's (Page,Tubbs,Witherspoon,Smith, were an unmotivated bunch and I think this is one of the weakest era's but that just my viewpoint
     
  6. Ponysmallhorse

    Ponysmallhorse Small but proud Full Member

    2,709
    6
    Mar 4, 2009
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  7. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    :lol: what the **** is this
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,223
    10,676
    Jul 28, 2009
    I would like to sum this thread up with

    Tommy: "Meh! Bahumbug Wladimir! Meh!"
     
  9. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    I agree Mr. Magoo. Based on atheleticism alone, I'd favour Wlad and Vitali to win on points but not without the possibility of being dropped once or twice by Spoon's overhand right.
     
  10. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,527
    3,127
    Feb 17, 2008
    Amen.

    The only A+ performance Tim had was the early ko of Tillis. And how far did Tillis go downhill after that Weaver bout? Everything else is or was lackluster including that first Smith fight.

    To beat Wlad Klitschko, a guy is going to have to have better form than that. And I sure don't think his cross armed defense is going to work negating a jab and he's wide open for that short left hook Wlad throws.
     
  11. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    Wlad is on another level.

    Spoon only has a puncher's chance.
     
  12. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    27
    Jun 2, 2009
    Knowing Spoon, he'd come in showing up fat and lose a decision
     
  13. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,061
    22,164
    Sep 15, 2009
    Very boring fight. Spoon will be stuck to trying to beat wlad to the jab and he'll fail time and time again before just trying to survive and losing on points.