Time For GGG vs. Canelo 3 To Happen.

Are you aware of the tax situation in NY vs Texas and Nevada? Fighters can pocket a lot more $$ fighting in Nevada and Texas, or even in Florida than they can in New York. NY is one of the most heavily taxed states in the country, and with the covid restrictions on fans, it is presently one of the worst possible places on earth to stage a major boxing event.

 

Neither of these guys are short on cash. All GGG ever wanted was a fair crack of the whip against Canelo he's been robbed TWICE in Vegas.
Ive always tried to be fair & I promised before Floyd / Pac &
Margarito/Cotto 1 & 2 & GGG/Canelo that if Floyd ,Cotto & Canelo legitimately won the fights I'd be the first to congratulate them & call them CHAMP!! It worked out that NEITHER of the 3 could legitimately beat my guys so I was unable to do it. Same with Margarito / Floyd all I wanted to see was Tony get a fair crack at beating Floyd & may the best man win
Floyd's cowardice stopped that from ever happening unfortunately
My chosen guys were obviously the FIGHTERS!!! Your guys were the cowardly divas

 

All G has ever wanted was a check

 

I never felt Golovkin has ever fought to please the fans or to enhance his legacy. It seemed like it was always the easiest way to mega money.

That whole I'll fight anyone at 154 was actually exclusive for Floyd. The I'll fight at 168 was just B.S.

 

Mayweather and Cotto aren't "my guys" CJ. You subscribe to a belief that Mayweather, Cotto and Canelo have the same fans. This is your imagination at work. Truth be told, I was a bigger fan of Pacquiao than Mayweather. Your super fandom of Tony is... intereresting to say the least. He has a bad reputation due to the loaded handwraps scandal, and your idea that Margarito didn't get a fair shake vs Cotto after what Margarito was accused of in their first match is hard to wrap one's mind around. Though I think you claimed that what happened in the rematch was unfair. But no need to beat a dead horse with Margarito. You have your view that Tony was wronged, did nothing wrong and I doubt you'll ever be able to convince anyone of your stance on all that.

As it pertains to Mayweather vs Pacquiao, I've made it clear that Mayweather vs Pac was a huge disapointment, both fighters were weak and pretty much the worst versions of themselves, probably due to all the drug testing that Mayweather demanded. The IV scandal, Pacquiao being injured. Given all the problems of that fight, the fight really meant nothing. Still given what it was, it was hard for anyone to not score it for Mayweather in a boring lopsided UD. Even Bob Arum couldn't bring himself to argue Pac won claiming he it was a draw.

As far as GGG Canelo, I know you can't bring yourself to admit that Canelo toppled GGG, but you know what happened. And I would ask you, even if you think GGG won, how would you rate Canelo's performance? In the first match, surely you witness Canelo boxing beautifully and giving GGG all kinds of problems, and in the rematch taking it to GGG Mexican Style was a sight to see. Your argument there I guess is that Canelo just didn't beat GGG convincingly enough for your taste. Regardless of your threshold for what you deem a Canelo victory, I don't see how even you could deny how well Canelo boxed and fought vs GGG and even if you thought GGG did enough to sqeak out a decison in either fight, surely you couldn't deny that Canelo gave him the fight of his life twice and pushed GGG to his absolute limit, which is an accomplishment in it of itself as no one else pushed GGG that hard. Especially considering Canelo was coming from Light Middleweight, it was a monumental accomplishment from Canelo to take GGG into such deep waters, especially when GGG had been the Middleweight bully for years and Canelo put an end to GGG's reign of dominance.

 

Youre adoration of Clenelo is really ludicrous. You call GGG " a middleweight bully" but your idol called himself WBC World MIDDLEWEIGHT Champion. To do that its only fair he defends it at 160.
But he instead meekly handed back his bogus title & got disowned by his own great Mexican fight fans & they named him El Pollo Rojo ROFLMAO!!
In all your BS novel I notice you havent put up any fights of Gingers that were 100% fair fights have you??? You couldn't there aren't any
Everything he got he really stole because he was fighting opponents who were really given no chance to win thanks to the NSAC & Vegas officials guaranteeing if he's stood at the final bell he could not lose. Some Champion huh LOL
As for Tony I was at the Cotto1 fight saw his hands wrapped same as the
Commission insp & Cotto's rep did & there was NOTHING illegal in there !!!!
Now as for Tony ... This was all started by that POS Richardson ,who was renown for complaining about their opponents wraps & demanding they be removed which Tony readily agreed to. Then Richardson rolled out the blatant lie saying "PLASTER BLOCKS" fell from the wrap ROFLMAO.
What happened to those "blocks" ??? No one else saw them
When all was said & done weeks after the fight the pads were tested MICROSCOPICALLY!! & minute traces of sulphur & Calcium were detected, which are in much larger quantities are ingredients of plaster
The amount detected was at a level found in HUMAN SWEAT !! NOT plaster. The CSAC failed to add the last part in their report ,it was missing from the lab report as they tried to vainly cover up their Goof!!
Prove one word of this is not 100% accurate or be a man & apologize to Tony for falsely accusing him
But you say Ginger only ate tainted beef by accident ROFLMAO Give it up Pumpkin

 

dude the biggest thing stopping fights from happening is the fighters themselves, you got guys with the same promoters that still don’t fight each other, the vast majority of these fighters are content winning a vacant belt and fighting bums begging for a payday