Time to accept Lomachenko is too big for Rigondeaux

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Jan 3, 2015.


  1. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,940
    2,697
    Apr 17, 2009
    lmao!

    watch first 3 mins of this.. flat footed my ****!!

    [YT]4kfOfz2fBHQ[/YT]
     
  2. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    347
    May 6, 2013
    Pavlik looks like a cement shoes statue compared to Loma to be honest.
     
  3. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Rigo does seem a lot smaller. He would be at a significant disadvantage I think.
     
  4. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,360
    7,940
    Sep 2, 2011
    You can't pick and choose your own definitions, they weren't considered professional fights back then and so they weren't.
     
  5. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,360
    7,940
    Sep 2, 2011
    Flat footed? WHAT?
     
  6. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Lomachenko was 138 vs Russell Jr. Rigondeaux's fight night weights haven't been shown much but he was 124 vs Cordoba, 128 vs Marroquin, and his team claims he was 125 vs Donaire.
     
  7. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    It is absolutely laughable that haters call him boring. That Bob Arum calls him boring. Donaire has been in stinkers, and his opponents were connected on him. It isn't Rigs' fault that his opponents usually can't hit him. He makes his opponents look amateurish, pound for pound guy like Donaire, and solid top 10 guy like Agbeko, included. It wasn't his fault, Donaire, and Agbeko etc. can't hit him. He made the name guys he fought look just as foolish and amateurish as the lower tier guys. That is some masterful ****.