Time to take matthew hatton seriously?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 26, 2010.


  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,645
    21,950
    Sep 15, 2009
    isnt saul a 154 fighter now?

    i have that fight about 60/40 in sauls favour. i cant believe i am going to say this but matthew would easily be one of sauls best victories.
     
  3. Starched Him

    Starched Him Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,681
    61
    Feb 5, 2009
    whoa re all these people he is fighting? i never heard of them, how good is he? good as ricky? almost? what weight
     
  4. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    your talking like hes a youngster making a name for himself. he is at his peak right now and i honestly cant see him beating most top welterweights in the division!
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,423
    Nov 30, 2006
    He deserves more respect than he gets, but within reason. He obviously isn't a top welterweight on world level, but could still conceivably maneuver his way to some version of a world title (like the IBO in a rematch with N'Dou).

    How about Hatton-Jennings?
     
  6. PikeMc

    PikeMc Member Full Member

    240
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    He is domestic class that can hang around a bit in europe. That is all. As for if he beat kel brook, he wouldnt ever. I seriously doubt he would even beat witter. But if he did, and then went on to beat mayweather, pacman and kiltschko. He could conceivably be the best ever
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,645
    21,950
    Sep 15, 2009
    that would be good. but if he beats witter i imagine he will already see himself above domestic level
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,645
    21,950
    Sep 15, 2009
    he aint no youngster, but he started boxing for the first time 12 years ago. he is gaining the experience now, and is in a physical peak i believe.

    i dont think he beats them anyways, my point is, if he wins his next couple of fights he talks about, it will be time to take him seriously.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,645
    21,950
    Sep 15, 2009
    he is a welterweight. nowhere near ricky's level. and the opponets have been ndou, branco, and nuzhnenko. the latest was an unbeaten fighter who is clearly crap.
     
  10. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Recent form puts him at fringe contender level. Cant see him beating Brook and would be surprised if he beat Witter. A decent domestic champ, better fighters should be fighting for the European welterweight chasmpionship though.
     
  11. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Get ****inn serious ffsake, the guy is domestic level. His last fight was a shocker, the guy was a dud, dont know where they got 25 guys for him to beat.
     
  12. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    people are forgetting that belge was/is a terrible boxer with a padded record, this win proves nothing
     
  13. No Fear

    No Fear Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,973
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    He'd stand a chance against any of the title holders not named Pacquiao.
     
  14. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    He won't get past Witter.
     
  15. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    i wont put my money on your prediction...:lol::lol:
    i see hatton beating witter in a terrible fight tho..:good