I was unsure whether to count the division from that far back or not due to the lapse when everyone moved up. I might revisit it though :think
You're breaking my heart, lufcrazy. Are you aware of the sordid history of these organizations? Of the pay-offs in the WBA and Jose Silly-Man's whimsical WBC list based on whom he wants to favor that month? They have stripped untold numbers of their own champions when they sought to fight a rival belt-holder. How about Duk-Koo Kim? He died as a direct result of their nonsense. He was something like 17-1 before he faced Mancini, his opposition was obscure, and there he is at #1 so Mancini had no choice but to fight him? Tell me how he got there. How did Kim earn the #1 spot in the WBA's ratings? These fools in the WBA and the WBC were small-time beggars -nothing but ****-ant extortion clubs begging for money until The Ring blew it with their ratings scandal in '77 and the networks turned to them for ratings and fake titles. The networks wanted their own ratings, and the public was fooled into thinking that their titles meant something and so tuned in. Meanwhile, they assign judges who can't even add scorecards correctly! The networks are gone from boxing and the only relevance those grifters and their belts have is the relevance we give them. You're an intelligent man -rethink your position. PS/ Leonard and Hearns? There "belts" had nothing to do with it and I'll prove it. Mike Trainer drew up the contract for that fight and put it down as a "a 15 round fight for the title." The WBA and the WBC were not even mentioned. And when the 2 organizations belatedly sought to sanction it, they got none of that red carpet treatment that they expected (they only travel first class) -they had to wait in line for credentials like everyone else. I don't think either fighter were extorted via sanctioning fees. THAT's how you treat them. And that's one thing Mayweather has gotten right about them. They need him more than he needs them. And have you gotten a load of Silly Man crying a river because Pacquiao disrespects the WBC? Read all about it when you get the chance.
For better or worse it is what it is. One man is always the best man out there and the best way for him to back that up is to unify all the belts. A global decision to not pay fees would be brilliant and the ring is probably the best we've got but still, unification fights are brilliant and I love them and see no valid reason for them not to take place.
This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected , This content is protected .
Not sure their position is overly relevant in terms of division history due to the lapse it went through, the division ceased to exist so I think it's just best treating the two separate but who knows I might change my mind.
they were world champions at the weight and should be recognised. it was not the boxers fault that the weight was allowed to hibernate for a while
so the division was widely accepted back then? I wasn't convinced which is why I left it out. I guess the same applies for the sfw division back then then?
For better or for worse? Must boxing be married to little dictators and their insanity? ...You -no, we love what the unification fights represent- and that is high-level contests between the best in the division. Most often, the top guys will have the belts because they too have been convinced that these organizations mean something. But you nor I would care about about Daniel Geale fighting Dmitry Pirog to "unify" their phony MW belts. Sergio and only Sergio is the true successor to Marvin Hagler. Do you believe that the rest just as worthy to identify themselves as such? Geale (I'll bet you that 75% of ESB couldn't tell you who he was or what belt he had and that should tell you something) and Pirog and Chavez Jr. and Sturm are pretenders to the throne. What can happen eventually if we start right the hell here is a scenerio where there Sergio is alone at the top and we all dump the alphabet soup on the floor and walk away. The top contenders duke it out among themselves -freely, without being forbidden to because they have phony titles, and the top man emerges seasoned and ready to mount a challenge to the throne. It isn't so difficult. Silly-Man and co are fighting for relevance these days. Their days are numbered and in their desperation they're getting worse by devising new "champions" for new "title fights" -all for more revenue. It ain't business, lufcrazy, it's a racket! Count the champions now and let's have a number. You think that's good? Imagine the condition American football would be in if we had 14 superbowls a month and no fan could even rattle off which teams were champions. It'd be a joke. The sport would be on course to a place where no one cares except for die-hards. It would become a niche sport. Sound familiar?
I wouldn't include Red Herring. He defeated Pinky Mitchell by DQ in March 25 -but the decision was reversed. It was reversed by a judge (not a boxing judge) A.J. Herring, who was the "custodian of the belt" and who sat on the state commission that "governed the belt." The NBA didn't like that decision so they recognized Herring after he beat Young Ketchell, though they then recognized Callahan after he defeated Pinky Mitchell. Tippy Larkin was not widely recognized -his title was considered a "trick title" and was abandoned after he beat Willie Joyce. The Massachusetts Boxing Commission revived the title -and it lasted one fight.
I think you misunderstand me: i'm not saying they (title holders) deserve the title of champion; they don't. I'm saying they should all fight each other to get the belts unified. As a side note, the lineal belt isn't the crown really due to lack of imposition to fight the best: Would you call shannon briggs the true champ in 97, or would you give the crown to holyfield?