Timeline of the premiere WW in the world.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Nov 19, 2011.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Epiphany; Epiphone do make quality guitars though ;-)
     
  2. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    Juicy.
     
  3. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    the only objection i can think of and its not massive is if mayweather ceases to be premiere ww in 2007, what does he do to claim it back now? beat victor ortiz? or was he "champion in recess" sort of thing?
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I didn't see Cuevas as no.1. That's not on IMO.
     
  5. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    Paper champ, not Lineal?

    I tend to agree a little with that. Cuevas was a very good fighter and 11 defenses even not as lineal champ is pretty decent, but he never carried the baton so to speak.
     
  6. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    How long would Leonard have hanged around as undisputed 147 champ if not for the detached retina?
     
  7. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    How different would Napoles legacy be if he'd had his prime @ WW from 1976-82? Would it be significantly less or far greater?
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Atm i'm up to, in detail, the ross-barney fights.

    Hopefully by tomorrow i'll have more detail on why I chose nelson.
     
  9. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    6
    Dec 7, 2007
    He didn't really lose to Gavilan though, he got the decision at the end of the day. I know it was an unpopular decision with the audience but i'm led to believe that there was a decent amount of writers in attendance who thought the decision to be just.

    Not sure that there is enough evidence that i have seen (happy to be proven wrong here) that it would be reasonable to go against the judges decision on that fight and place Gavilan as the main man in the division in 48. It gave him the right to be the main contendor to the throne and Robinson then left no doubt after the title fight in 49.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Away from my computer now but i'll get back to you tomorrow.

    Ok so the main objections so far are cuevas and gavilan in 48?
     
  11. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    553
    Feb 17, 2010
    The dropoff in quality circa Forrest is glaring to me.

    Sure there were some ups and downs in the strength of the top men beforehand, but usually they were nonetheless fine fighters on their own merit.That recent period saw the start of so-so fighters being consistently at the top and blown up smaller really good fighters taking advantage of it. And in the process getting totally overhyped by the multiple weightclass fans(both the general forum guys and the real old-school favouring ones on here).
     
  12. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    Robinson did not lose to Gavilan.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    Hmmmmm not sure I agree there.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Parts of the timeline a bit crazy, mixing of criteria will always cause that though
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Robinson did not lose to Gavilan, can't see how that's up for debate.