Timothy Bradley is the most overrated fighter here by far

Are these questions rhetorical? I need to know before I answer.

 

Hahaha! :good

 

I can see why Some may find humor in that.

 

"basically pacs fans talked about pac like he was an unbeaten fighter 7 years ago.....i mean...he kind of had the aura of one......then jmm sparked him out....then he showed up like garbage against floyd and made bunk excuses"

"timmy gets talked up a little too highly for my taste...and its obvious why...pac fans are insecure and want to build those wins as something amazing...or something we should look at in reverance.....they are good wins no doubt....just not great"

"so relax..once again...your insecurities about pac are showing...and your inferiority complex to floyd is popping out as well"

That sounds reasonable and rational to you? This is of course after he claimed that Tim Bradley is being used to "legitmize Pacquio" and then brings up Floyd mayweather as a way to further accuse people of having an agenda when it's perfectly clear who is the one with an agenda.

Proper debate with Shockmaster?

 

i actually agree with the OP here....and i think the reason people overrate him is because they want to prop up pacs resume further...pacs resume is already good ...but they want to make it to be legendary ...like murderers row.....i think bradly is overrated

is that sufficient?

 

You may not believe that.

 

He actually thought I didn't catch his joke which I did... it's obvious you didnt.. you're a little slow aren't you beards? Pavlik chased greatness and took risks.... When is GGG?:think.. That's right, he's not going to.

 

That dude doesn't even talk about boxing... he just follows people in to threads and asks a bunch of damn questions, like "Are you serious?" "Why?" Yada yada... I put his alt ass on Ignore, and suggest you should too.

 

Sounds like something Pimp C would say.

 

If Pacquio's resume is only good then I can only imagine who you think should be in the HOF.

Once again.

The guy held 5 lineal titles in 5 different weight classes, 8 world titles, and ascended 12 weight divisions. He is also the third fighter in boxing history to win three "Glamour Division" titles (flyweight, featherweight, and welterweight) and beat many of the best fighters in his time.

Pacquiao is generally considered to be one of the greatest boxers of all time as he is the first and only eight-division world champion.

 

Are you folks generally unable to understand that GGG is attempting to unify the middleweight division, become undisputed, and thus standing in a line that includes Monzon, Hopkins, Hagler, Giardello, Benevenuti, etc and then he will move up in weight.

It used to be that seeing a fighter become the undisputed champion was desired and looked at as courageous.

 

Bradley is a great boxer IMOthumbsup

 

Again look at Pavlik's 160 title defences.

Pavlik is shockingly overated, typical American hype.

 

I truly believe nationalism/racism is why alot of people don't want to see GGG unify. They would rather Hopkins keep his claim to unifying all 4 belts, even though a welterweight (Trinidad ) did all the hard work.

Oh and a blown up lightweight got a gift against Sturm.