Timothy Bradley vs Manny Pacquaio

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by moneymatt, Oct 7, 2009.


  1. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
  2. Irishrover91

    Irishrover91 REP 4 SOUTH AFRICA Full Member

    520
    0
    Jun 4, 2009
    :yep LOL dont make me laugh he would be beaten by Bradley...he shoud fite a liteweight the mayweather fite proved that
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    Good post. Bradley would definitely give Pac some problems. The thing is none here rate Bradley that highly so it's an automatic Pac by KO response. But if people actually analyzed styles instead blindly picking Pac they would realize this is no walk over for Pac. Bradley is a skilled guy with a good jab, fast hands, strong, good defense great stamina and movement who would give anyone in the world 140 and down a good fight.
     
  4. mantacougar1

    mantacougar1 Guest

    pimp C,

    exactly! these *******s only have one response to any opponent for pacquiao and that is "pacquiao by ko". they don't try to analyze their reasoning because of their complete lack of boxing knowledge so they just say " pacquiao by ko" lol...anyways, bradley is a very technically sound boxer with good reflexes and defense. pacquiao may get him in the later rounds but even that isn't etched in stone. very difficult fight indeed!
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    I agree. Most of them don't know **** about the sport and have only been following it since Pac burst upon the scene.
     
  6. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    :patsch:patsch:patsch:patsch

    this from a guy that doesnt give a **** about the sport and only follows one fighter like a dumb groupie.
     
  7. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    tim bradley would beat pac, faster much better boxer.keep it 100 damn.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    You don't know **** **** you troll. Your days are numbered *******.
     
  9. moneymatt

    moneymatt Active Member Full Member

    654
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
    tim bradley would beat paquaio. bradley has tremendous speed and reflexes, as well as a high workrate and good countering ability. he would be the most complete fighter that paquaio has faced above 130.
     
  10. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Prove that i dont know ****.

    I'll wait.:deal
     
  11. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    You keep saying that the best boxer of the era isn't **** and a fraud for starters that's all I need to say right there.:deal:hi:
     
  12. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Ive never said that the guy couldnt fight and ive said it many times that he was great at 130 but after Castillo he became the cherrypicker we see today.

    everyone that isnt a delusional groupie can see that.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,059
    35,175
    Jun 23, 2005
    The guy is continuing to win despite beating guys you said he would lose to like Oscar for example. Not to mention he has remained undefeated and won 1 linear championship a fighter of the year award and became the #1 P4P fighter in the sport since leaving 135 and he's not done yet. Does that sound like a fraud career to you?
     
  14. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Telling lies again,show when did i pick Oscar to beat fraud?
     
  15. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009

    its the fans, commentators,experts, boxing analyst who game the kid the title "P4P". How could that be a fraud career?