Timothy Bradley vs Ruslan Provodnikov. Who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Jul 8, 2010.


Page 3 of 8
  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    I give Bradley the edge in power,speed,stamina,style,intelligence,determination,heart,chin,experience,and intangibles.

    But Provodnikov is European

    interesting matchup:think
     
    Boom_Boom, Jul 8, 2010
    Boom_Boom, Jul 8, 2010
    #31
  2. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Oh please, the fight wasn't even debatable and you know it. Never in a million years should that have been a split decision.

    Plovodnikov is wide open everytime he throws his telegraphed punches. Too left hand happy aswell, doesn't have the jab to establish any punches or keep Bradley from finding his rhythm.

    He gets put on his arse everytime he throws that stupid, telegraphed right-hook to the body that leaves him wide open with his chin hanging up in the air.
     
    TommyV, Jul 8, 2010
    TommyV, Jul 8, 2010
    #32
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Bailey has campaigned for most of his career at LWW, whilst Mosely has been at WW for a long time now, and Randall isnt really known for durability as well as being a fighter who has aged in boxing years, so thats a poor comparison. Im talking about an undefeated puncher against a champ who has been put down by a seemingly lighter puncher.
    Bradley didnt lose to Witter, and ive never said he did I said it was a SD, and Bradley does get props for travelling, but remember the next time Witter stepped up in class again he was stopped and as said probably in hindsight scored his best win before he won his title, in a close run fight with Kotelnik.
    How have I wound you up by asking you to pick a fight between a champ who has gone down a couple of times against a resonable puncher against an undefeated big puncher.
     
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    #33
  4. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    This ****in guy is a ****in joke. Why the **** is this thread still going?
     
    HENDO, Jul 9, 2010
    HENDO, Jul 9, 2010
    #34
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Wheres the joke
     
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    #35
  6. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I know right..Provodnikov is nothing special...A guy with decent power and has **** poor defense, and eats ways too many shots!:patsch
     
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    #36
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    You dont mention though that he is a solid puncher and Bradley was down twice to Holt who lost his fight after.

    How do you think it would unfold?
     
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    #37
  8. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    I'm going to go way out on a limb and say Bradley.
     
    des3995, Jul 9, 2010
    des3995, Jul 9, 2010
    #38
  9. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :patsch Provodonikov isnt Holt so please stop comparing the two...Ruslan hasnt even fought a top notch contender yet and you're saying he's going compete against one the top fighters in the 140 division???

    He gets dominated if not shut out! He just doesnt have what it takes to compete against Bradley as of now! He gets hit way too much...He doesnt use his jab to get on the inside.
     
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    #39
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Provodonikov isnt Holt. Holt just got stopped by a guy with 6 losses and 3 draws, and Holt was KOd by a journeyman before. So I agree Provodnikov isnt Holt.
     
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    #40
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :patschFAIL!

    You're the one who made the dumb comparison...NOT me!:verysad
     
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    #41
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,112
    Dec 11, 2009
    Where have I made a comparison? I just noted that Holt had put Bradley down twice.
    Arent you the person who said Provodnikov isnt Holt...:patsch
     
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    bailey, Jul 9, 2010
    #42
  13. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009



    :lol::lol:
     
    des3995, Jul 9, 2010
    des3995, Jul 9, 2010
    #43
  14. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Can you read???:verysad
     
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    Rudyard, Jul 9, 2010
    #44
  15. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    Settle down.

    Bradley is a PFP fighter. He's not just the best fighter at 140, but one of the best in boxing.

    He's experienced, he's proven, he's adaptable. He can put on pressure, and box off the backfoot. If you don't have a jab, you don't have a prayer.

    If Peterson, who's longer and more athletic than Bradley with a great jab got outboxed and outfought, how does Provodnikov have a prayer?

    Aside from that Provodnikov is green and unproven. This fight would a complete wipe out and may end in a KO.

    It's a different class.

    You're talking about one of the top technical boxers in the sport against a green one dimensional puncher.

    Be real...
     
    HENDO, Jul 9, 2010
    HENDO, Jul 9, 2010
    #45
Page 3 of 8