Tips on Boxing History Research?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Sep 14, 2018.


  1. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Thought I might have found something interesting on boxing from 1762, turned out it was literally about boxes of paper. *sigh*
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  2. Red Revolving Pepperman

    Red Revolving Pepperman New Member Full Member

    82
    76
    Sep 5, 2018
    I was not playing gotcha. I only play gotcha when I'm debating something important. For example, I am about to play gotcha again our RK Fox debate. Debates must be conducted vigorously.

    When I am off-duty, and not debating, I am happy to help others in their research, when I can.
     
  3. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Gotchaism is not debating something vigorously, lol, it refers to stuff like intentionally ignoring the actual substance of an argument to try and catch someone on a technicality.

    But if you were just aiming to add a bit of info there, I'm sorry for assuming bad intentions.
     
  4. Red Revolving Pepperman

    Red Revolving Pepperman New Member Full Member

    82
    76
    Sep 5, 2018
    In that case, I am not practicing gotchaism as you define it. I am using gotchas as the leading dictionaries define them:

    In accord with these definitions, I believe that I have made several unexpected, disconcerting revelations about Jim Corbett's technique, and that these revelations give me the advantage over you.

    But I did not debate dishonestly. I certainly did not avoid the substance of your counterarguments.

    That's all by the way. I didn't come to this thread to debate Jim Corbett. I came to discuss books that might help you, and others, with your research.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,034
    Jun 30, 2005
    For my part, I agree with the general thrust of these posts. Academic social history is useful in a lot of ways, but also tends to myopically focus on a couple selected topics (social construction of the big 3 sociological categories - race, class, and gender). Sometimes it also fuzzes up the differences between historical fact and historical public perception. History that leans heavily on Continental philosophy and critical theory is particularly bad about this. If I wanted to understand the technical details of what happened in a fight or fighter's career (boxing is a very individual sport), I'd be more likely to reach for Pollack, Compton, Moyle, etc. Or the earlier generation of academic historians.

    That being said, it's really cool that there are more academics writing these days, and I look forward to seeing the insights from social history integrated into what we already have.
     
    mrkoolkevin and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  6. Red Revolving Pepperman

    Red Revolving Pepperman New Member Full Member

    82
    76
    Sep 5, 2018
    Your mistake is understandable. I am an abrasive arguer. That much is true. But I am not a malicious one.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Would you recommend any of their articles or books in particular?
     
  8. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,970
    2,413
    Jul 11, 2005
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  9. Red Revolving Pepperman

    Red Revolving Pepperman New Member Full Member

    82
    76
    Sep 5, 2018
    Ask me again in a few months. I'm in the middle of a major re-evaluation of my views on boxing history.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Was it something you read about Corbett?
     
  11. Red Revolving Pepperman

    Red Revolving Pepperman New Member Full Member

    82
    76
    Sep 5, 2018
    :lol:

    A fine guess.

    But Corbett is only the tip of the iceberg. There's more coming, on a broad front. Corbett's only the first myth to fall.
     
    Pat M and mrkoolkevin like this.
  12. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
  13. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    151
    Jul 30, 2006
    Cross reference as many sources as possible.

    including 'local' accounts from 'smaller' papers from the town's or areas where the fight took place.
    these reporters weren't usually swayed as much by the party line, so to speak, and weren't necessarily seeking anyone's approval of their reports, less bias, unless of course it is a hometown boy, which may or may not factor in. but always cross reference.

    try and get to know who the Top Reporters were and their affiliation to the Don Kings of the sport, trying to accurately sift their work objectively. same for Managers, Referees, and fighters even.

    MONEY, popularity making, national hopes or bias, seedy characters or bodies who benefit from payed services and that sort of thing.

    Cross reference other Top fighters records and Reports on them too.

    Look at the Rules of play, the required title positions defence or not, times for defences, other weights to see if the same rules are being applied, other fighters to ensure the same, contention placements, and over extended periods of time and so on.

    Fighters facts, injury, sickness, poor showing and that sort of thing.

    dig and keep digging, little gems & subtleties come around. just try and be as thorough and complete as possible.

    Remember the Recorded History solidifies the Facts, not you and especially not others who don't know the facts

    don't assume and equally ENJOY the process.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  14. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Just read whatever Mark Ant and Surfinghm and Mendoza post and go from there. Surefire success awaits.
     
  15. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,970
    2,413
    Jul 11, 2005
    Local source doesn't always mean the same city, there are a number of cities that have a "neighbor". St. Paul and Minneapolis (Minnesota), Kansas City in Missouri and Kansas, Detroit (Michigan) and Windsor (Ontario, Canada), Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) and Camden (New Jersey), Buffalo (New York) and Fort Erie (Ontario, Canada), Wilkes-Barre and Scranton (Pennsylvania), Davenport (Iowa) and Rock Island and Moline (Illinois), San Francisco and Oakland (California), Pawtucket and Providence (Rhode Island), etc. Use the map to see nearby locations that could have sent their own correspondent to report the fight or might have printed an opinion of local citizens who attended it.
     
    BitPlayerVesti and thistle1 like this.